PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the planning of radiation therapy for patients with cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed in 15 patients with predominantly advanced cervical carcinomas. Skin markings of the radiation ports were labeled with MR-detectable tubing and beads to assess the adequacy of port placement. Volume and extent of tumor at MR imaging were compared with those at physical and computed tomographic (CT) examinations. RESULTS: Tumor involvement of normal structures (parametrium, vagina, endometrium) was more extensive at MR imaging than at clinical examination in six patients (40%) and at CT in five patients (33%), resulting in modification of the radiation fields in eight patients (53%). Tumor size was larger on MR images than at clinical examination in 11 patients (73%). CONCLUSION: MR imaging can depict tumor volume and better delineate the extent of involvement than physical and CT examination. This can be useful for placement of radiation ports, especially when small boost fields are used.
PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the planning of radiation therapy for patients with cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed in 15 patients with predominantly advanced cervical carcinomas. Skin markings of the radiation ports were labeled with MR-detectable tubing and beads to assess the adequacy of port placement. Volume and extent of tumor at MR imaging were compared with those at physical and computed tomographic (CT) examinations. RESULTS:Tumor involvement of normal structures (parametrium, vagina, endometrium) was more extensive at MR imaging than at clinical examination in six patients (40%) and at CT in five patients (33%), resulting in modification of the radiation fields in eight patients (53%). Tumor size was larger on MR images than at clinical examination in 11 patients (73%). CONCLUSION: MR imaging can depict tumor volume and better delineate the extent of involvement than physical and CT examination. This can be useful for placement of radiation ports, especially when small boost fields are used.
Authors: Zhibin Huang; Nina A Mayr; Mingcheng Gao; Simon S Lo; Jian Z Wang; Guang Jia; William T C Yuh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Cameron W Swanick; Katherine O Castle; Sastry Vedam; Mark F Munsell; Lehendrick M Turner; Gaiane M Rauch; Anuja Jhingran; Patricia J Eifel; Ann H Klopp Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M P Schmid; B Mansmann; M Federico; J C A Dimopoulous; P Georg; E Fidarova; W Dörr; R Pötter Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Johannes C A Dimopoulos; Peter Petrow; Kari Tanderup; Primoz Petric; Daniel Berger; Christian Kirisits; Erik M Pedersen; Erik van Limbergen; Christine Haie-Meder; Richard Pötter Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 6.280