Literature DB >> 8210278

Crafting effective tobacco counteradvertisements: lessons from a failed campaign directed at teenagers.

J W McKenna1, K N Williams.   

Abstract

Focus group research conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Office on Smoking and Health suggested that the desire of teenagers to gain control over their lives would make them responsive to a counteradvertising strategy aimed at exposing the predatory marketing techniques of the tobacco industry. On the basis of this strategy, the office developed draft print advertisements and a rough TV commercial featuring such theme lines as "You get an image. They get an addict." In those ads, "they" referred to cigarette companies. Subsequent testing of the campaign materials, however, indicated that the subtle, sophisticated execution of this concept of manipulation by the industry did not communicate clearly and effectively to an audience of young teens. In fact, 38 percent of those who viewed the rough TV spot believed that the main message promoted smoking. These negative test findings underscore the critical need for ongoing audience research throughout the creative process to ensure that campaign planners stay "in tune" with their consumers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8210278      PMCID: PMC1403312     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  8 in total

1.  Risk factors for adolescent cigarette smoking. The Muscatine study.

Authors:  T M Reimers; P R Pomrehn; S L Becker; R M Lauer
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1990-11

2.  Past lessons and new uses of the mass media in reducing tobacco consumption.

Authors:  A C Erickson; J W McKenna; R M Romano
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs.

Authors:  B S Flynn; J K Worden; R H Secker-Walker; G J Badger; B M Geller; M C Costanza
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States. Projections to the year 2000.

Authors:  J P Pierce; M C Fiore; T E Novotny; E J Hatziandreu; R M Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Results of prevention programs with adolescents.

Authors:  C L Perry
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Development of a smoking prevention mass media program using diagnostic and formative research.

Authors:  J K Worden; B S Flynn; B M Geller; M Chen; L G Shelton; R H Secker-Walker; D S Solomon; L J Solomon; S Couchey; M C Costanza
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  RJR Nabisco's cartoon camel promotes camel cigarettes to children.

Authors:  J R DiFranza; J W Richards; P M Paulman; N Wolf-Gillespie; C Fletcher; R D Jaffe; D Murray
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Who profits from tobacco sales to children?

Authors:  J R DiFranza; J B Tye
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: results of a longitudinal youth study.

Authors:  M Siegel; L Biener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: case studies from USA and Canada.

Authors:  C Pechmann; E T Reibling
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida "truth" campaign.

Authors:  D F Sly; R S Hopkins; E Trapido; S Ray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions.

Authors:  M C Farrelly; J Niederdeppe; J Yarsevich
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Comparing belief in short-term versus long-term consequences of smoking and vaping as predictors of non-use in a 3-year nationally representative survey study of US youth.

Authors:  Emma Jesch; Ava Irysa Kikut; Robert Hornik
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.953

Review 6.  Ticking all the boxes? A systematic review of education and communication interventions to prevent tick-borne disease.

Authors:  Fiona Mowbray; Richard Amlôt; G James Rubin
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.