Literature DB >> 8209936

Electrocautery used to create incisions does not increase wound infection rates.

G Groot1, E W Chappell.   

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial was conducted to determine whether electrocautery as a means of creating abdominal or thoracic wounds would result in increased wound infection rates. Over a 15-month period, 492 consecutively studied patients were randomly placed into 1 of 2 groups: scalpel or electrocautery. There were no differences in age grouping, use of steroids, incidence of diabetes, number of days preoperative, operative time, use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, use of drains, number of obese patients, or gender ratio. Wound infections developed in 38 of the 250 scalpel patients (15%) and in 30 of the 242 cautery patients (12%). The use of electrocautery to create surgical wounds does not increase wound infection rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8209936     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90106-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  13 in total

1.  Diathermy vs. scalpel skin incisions in general surgery: double-blind, randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  Muhammad Shamim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Experimental and clinical study of influence of high-frequency electric surgical knives on healing of abdominal incision.

Authors:  Guang-Wei Ji; Yuan-Zhi Wu; Xu Wang; Hua-Xiong Pan; Ping Li; Wan-Ying Du; Zhi Qi; An Huang; Li-Wei Zhang; Li Zhang; Wen Chen; Guang-Hua Liu; Hui Xu; Quan Li; Ai-Hua Yuan; Xiao-Ping He; Guo-Hua Mei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Wound complications and clinical results of electrocautery versus a scalpel to create a cutaneous flap in thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Mehmet Uludag; Gurkan Yetkin; Alper Ozel; M Banu Yilmaz Ozguven; Senay Yener; Adnan Isgor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Scalpel versus electrosurgery for major abdominal incisions.

Authors:  Kittipat Charoenkwan; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; Kittipan Rerkasem; Elizabeth Matovinovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-14

5.  Safety of colorado microdissection needle (stryker) for skin opening in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Rohit Sharma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-03-18

6.  Increased use of surgical energy promotes methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in rabbits following open ventral hernia mesh repair.

Authors:  Joseph S Fernandez-Moure; Jeffrey L Van Eps; Lilia Peress; Concepcion Cantu; Randall J Olsen; Leslie Jenkins; Fernando J Cabrera; Ennio Tasciotti; Bradley K Weiner; Brian J Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Diathermy versus Scalpel Incision in a Heterogeneous Cohort of General Surgery Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Omobolaji O Ayandipo; Oludolapo O Afuwape; David Irabor; Odunayo M Oluwatosin; Vincent Odigie
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun

8.  Modified microdissection electrocautery needle.

Authors:  Virendra Singh; Pramod Kumar
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

9.  Randomized, clinical trial on diathermy and scalpel incisions in elective general surgery.

Authors:  Altaf Ahmed Talpur; Abdul Basir Khaskheli; Nandlal Kella; Akmal Jamal
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 0.611

10.  The effects of scalpel, harmonic scalpel and monopolar electrocautery on the healing of colonic anastomosis after colonic resection.

Authors:  Gökhan Karaca; M Recep Pekcici; Canan Altunkaya; Vildan Fidanci; Aytul Kilinc; Huseyin Ozer; Ahmet Tekeli; Kuzey Aydinuraz; Osman Guler
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.