Literature DB >> 820955

An evaluation of multiphasic screening on admission to hospital. Precis of a report to the National Health and Medical Research Council.

T C Durbridge, F Edwards, R G Edwards, M Atkinson.   

Abstract

A controlled study of admission multiphasic screening (AMS) at a large general hospital showed that AMS had no significant effect on a variety of indices of inpatient progress. Owing to a 64% increase in estimated cost of investigations with AMS, the total hospital admission cost was increased by approximately 5%. Under the conditions of this study, AMS added to the cost of hospitalization without associated evidence of benefit to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 820955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

1.  Letter from . . . South Australia. Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science and admission multiphasic screening.

Authors:  P Rhodes
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-10-02

2.  How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnostic test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Pursuit of abnormal coagulation screening tests generates modest hidden preoperative costs.

Authors:  J B Bushick; J M Eisenberg; J Kinman; R D Cebul; J S Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  A framework for clinical evaluation of diagnostic technologies.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; P X Tugwell; D H Feeny; R B Haynes; M Drummond
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Task Force on Medical Clearance of Adults Part I: Introduction, Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines.

Authors:  Eric L Anderson; Kimberly Nordstrom; Michael P Wilson; Jennifer M Peltzer-Jones; Leslie Zun; Anthony Ng; Michael H Allen
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.