Literature DB >> 8208888

Do mental health surveys disturb? Further evidence.

A F Jorm1, A S Henderson, R Scott, A J Mackinnon, A E Korten, H Christensen.   

Abstract

In a community survey of 873 persons aged 70 years or over, focusing on dementia, cognitive decline, depression, and current life circumstances, we included an enquiry into the emotional impact of the interview. A large majority reported at the end of the interview that it had no adverse effect on their emotional state. About 4% reported that it made them distressed, 1% that it depressed them, and 2% that it had intruded on their privacy. By contrast, 52% said it had made them feel good about themselves. Distress seemed to be largely related to performing poorly on cognitive tests. There is no information on the duration of these effects in the period following the interview. It is recommended that respondents in community surveys, including the elderly, be informed that they can decline to answer any question, and that interviewers be trained in how to respond to the few who will be distressed by the experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8208888     DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700026994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  8 in total

1.  The development and implementation of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, the National Survey of American Life, and the National Latino and Asian American Survey.

Authors:  Beth-Ellen Pennell; Ashley Bowers; Deborah Carr; Stephanie Chardoul; Gina-Qian Cheung; Karl Dinkelmann; Nancy Gebler; Sue Ellen Hansen; Steve Pennell; Myriam Torres
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Participation in a trauma-focused epidemiological investigation may result in sensitization for current health problems.

Authors:  Margot J Verschuur; Philip Spinhoven; Arnold A P van Emmerik; Frits R Rosendaal
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Adverse reactions associated with studying persons recently exposed to mass urban disaster.

Authors:  Joseph A Boscarino; Charles R Figley; Richard E Adams; Sandro Galea; Heidi Resnick; Alan R Fleischman; Michael Bucuvalas; Joel Gold
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  Release bias in accessing medical records in clinical trials: a STAR*D report.

Authors:  T Michael Kashner; Madhukar H Trivedi; Annie Wicker; Maurizio Fava; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Stephen R Wisniewski; A John Rush
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Damon or Pandora?

Authors:  V F Maher
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2000

6.  Ethical aspects of research on psychological trauma.

Authors:  D J Stein; A Herman; D Kaminer; S Rataemane; S Seedat; R C Kessler; D Williams
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.986

7.  Examining the benefits and harms of Alzheimer's disease screening for family members of older adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicole R Fowler; Katharine J Head; Anthony J Perkins; Sujuan Gao; Christopher M Callahan; Tamilyn Bakas; Shelley D Suarez; Malaz A Boustani
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Ethics of research on survivors of trauma.

Authors:  Soraya Seedat; Willem P Pienaar; David Williams; Daniel J Stein
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.081

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.