Literature DB >> 8204776

Treatment of disseminated disease due to the Mycobacterium avium complex in patients with AIDS.

C A Benson1.   

Abstract

Perhaps the most important recent advance in the field of infections due to the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is the identification and development of more effective agents for the treatment and prevention of disseminated disease. These agents include clarithromycin, azithromycin, rifabutin and other rifamycins, ethambutol, clofazimine, fluoroquinolones, amikacin, and liposome-encapsulated gentamicin. Most clinicians currently use multidrug therapy to maximize efficacy and to minimize the emergence of resistance. Prospective clinical trials of multidrug regimens suggest that MAC colony counts in blood decline during therapy, usually with alleviation of clinical symptoms. The small size and short duration of these trials have not permitted an evaluation of survival or quality of life. Because the contribution of any single agent to multidrug trials is difficult to assess, short-term trials of monotherapy have been conducted recently; clarithromycin, azithromycin, ethambutol, and liposome-encapsulated gentamicin have been most active. Rifabutin and rifampin, clofazimine, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin may contribute to the efficacy of multidrug regimens. Current recommendations include the following: (1) disseminated MAC disease should be treated in patients with AIDS; (2) initial treatment should consist of at least two agents; (3) oral clarithromycin or azithromycin is the preferred first agent; (4) ethambutol is the most rational choice for the second agent; and (5) in appropriate cases, additional agents (rifampin or rifabutin, clofazimine, ciprofloxacin, or parenteral amikacin) may be added. Therapy should continue for life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8204776     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/18.supplement_3.s237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  8 in total

1.  Comparative protective effects of recombinant DNA and Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccines against M. avium infection.

Authors:  E Martin; J A Triccas; A T Kamath; N Winter; W J Britton
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Mycobacterium avium complex infection. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations that may improve clinical outcomes.

Authors:  C A Peloquin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Protection against virulent Mycobacterium avium infection following DNA vaccination with the 35-kilodalton antigen is accompanied by induction of gamma interferon-secreting CD4(+) T cells.

Authors:  E Martin; A T Kamath; J A Triccas; W J Britton
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Therapeutic efficacy of liposomal clofazimine against Mycobacterium avium complex in mice depends on size of initial inoculum and duration of infection.

Authors:  R G Kansal; R Gomez-Flores; I Sinha; R T Mehta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Choosing the right macrolide antibiotic. A guide to selection.

Authors:  L Charles; J Segreti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Current and potential treatment of tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Houston; A Fanning
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Disseminated mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC) infection in the era of effective antiretroviral therapy: is prophylaxis still indicated?

Authors:  Christoph G Lange; Ian J Woolley; Reinhard H Brodt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Avoidance and management of adverse reactions to antituberculosis drugs.

Authors:  A M Patel; J McKeon
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.606

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.