Literature DB >> 8201948

Chromosome painting analysis of X-ray-induced aberrations in human lymphocytes in vitro.

A Matsuoka1, J D Tucker, M Hayashi, N Yamazaki, T Sofuni.   

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements in human lymphocytes induced by X-rays (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 Gray) were analyzed using chromosome painting. DNA probes for human chromosomes 1, 3 or 4 alone, and a combination of 1 and 4, were used for analysis. The frequency of cells with rearrangements, i.e. reciprocal translocations, dicentrics, insertions, tricentrics and fragments, involving chromosome 4 increased with dose in both 48 and 72 h cultures. The number of translocations per cell also increased with dose at 48 and 72 h. Dicentrics increased with dose in 48 h but not in 72 h cultures. The estimated genomic frequency of aberrations per cell was comparable with results in banded cells. No difference was shown on the detection efficiency of chromosome rearrangements among the various DNA probes used. Since this technique does not necessarily require well-spread metaphases for analysis, it is possible to increase the number of analyzable metaphases compared with the banding technique. Chromosome painting is a simpler, more objective and more practical method for detecting chromosome rearrangements than conventional banding analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8201948     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/9.2.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  3 in total

1.  Seventeen-year follow-up study on chromosomal aberrations in five victims accidentally exposed to several Gy of 60Co gamma-rays.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Cui-Zhen Jin; Xue-Qing Zhang; Shi-Li Ge; Ze-Yun Zhang; Hui Xu; Xiu-Lin Liu; De-Chang Wu; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Paternally inherited chromosomal structural aberrations detected in mouse first-cleavage zygote metaphases by multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization painting.

Authors:  F Marchetti; X Lowe; D H Moore; J Bishop; A J Wyrobek
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  The importance of age and smoking in evaluating adverse cytogenetic effects of exposure to environmental agents.

Authors:  J D Tucker; D H Moore
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.