Literature DB >> 8201292

Observations on the epistemological status of bioethics.

M Reichlin1.   

Abstract

Different definitions of bioethics in American and Italian literature are reported. It is argued that they refer to three different conceptions of the epistemological status of bioethics: the first conceives of it as an application of moral principles to biomedical problems, the second as a methodology for the working out of clinical judgement, the third as a broader and interdisciplinary public inquiry. It is suggested that each approach grasps a part of the truth, for each singles out one level of the bioethical work. Bioethics is in fact a complex, three-level form of knowledge. The misunderstanding of this complexity has led to some confusion and to conflicts of attribution among those who are concerned with it.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Philosophical Approach; Twentieth Century

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8201292     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/19.1.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  4 in total

1.  Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? "The embedded researcher" as a methodological approach.

Authors:  Stella Reiter-Theil
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

2.  Designing ethicists.

Authors:  M Brannigan
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-08

3.  Health and human rights: epistemological status and perspectives of development.

Authors:  Emmanuel Kabengele Mpinga; Leslie London; Philippe Chastonay
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2011-08

4.  Tuskegee University experience challenges conventional wisdom: is integrative bioethics practice the new ethics for the public's health?

Authors:  Stephen Olufemi Sodeke
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.