Literature DB >> 8201143

Caudal epidural blocks for elderly patients with lumbar canal stenosis.

J O Ciocon1, D Galindo-Ciocon, L Amaranath, D Galindo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of caudal epidural blocks (CEB) in relieving pain and the duration of pain relief with CEB in elderly patients suffering from degenerative lumbar canal stenosis (LCS).
DESIGN: This study was a descriptive, prospective study with a 10-month follow-up. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: Thirty patients, 76 +/- 6.7 years of age, with leg discomfort with or without back pain and with LCS documented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 1 year of the study, were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Cleveland Clinic Florida. None of the subjects had received CEB or surgery for their leg discomfort and none had relief of pain by analgesics alone. MEASUREMENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received a total of three doses of 0.5% Xylocaine with 80 mg Depo-Medrol into the caudal epidural space through the sacral hiatus at weekly intervals. The Roland 5-point pain rating scale was utilized before and at 2-month intervals up to 10 months after the CEB was administered. MRI was used to identify the degree of LCS.
RESULTS: The degree of LCS on admission was moderate in 66.7% (n = 20) of the patients, mild in 23.3% (n = 7), and severe in the remaining 10% (n = 3). Patients had LCS involving 2.4 +/- 0.49 lumbar vertebrae. The degree of LCS is directly correlated with the pain level before CEB. After CEB, the pain level changed from 3.43 +/- 0.82 to 1.5 +/- 0.86 (P < 0.0000), with a significant relief of pain up to 10 months (the end of observation). The duration of pain relief ranged from 4 to 10 months (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: CEB offers significant pain relief and appears to be a reasonable therapeutic option among elderly patients with LCS. This alternative seems particularly important among patients with poor response to drug therapy and who are either poor surgical risks or who have refused surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8201143     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06855.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  6 in total

Review 1.  Epidural steroid injections in the management of low-back pain with radiculopathy: an update of their efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Michel Benoist; Philippe Boulu; Gilles Hayem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injection for management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: short-term and long-term results.

Authors:  Joon Woo Lee; Jae Sung Myung; Kun Woo Park; Jin S Yeom; Ki-Jeong Kim; Hyun-Jib Kim; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Outcomes of fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis patients.

Authors:  Chaiwat Kraiwattanapong; Supaporn Wechmongkolgorn; Bangon Chatriyanuyok; Patarawan Woratanarat; Umaporn Udomsubpayakul; Pongsathorn Chanplakorn; Gun Keorochana; Wiwat Wajanavisit
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-04-08

Review 5.  The Role of Neuro-Immune Interactions in Chronic Pain: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Po-Yi Paul Su; Lingyi Zhang; Liangliang He; Na Zhao; Zhonghui Guan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.832

6.  Epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Mark A Harrast
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.