Literature DB >> 8200938

Comparison of second and third generation methods for measurement of serum thyrotropin in patients with overt hyperthyroidism, patients receiving thyroxine therapy, and those with nonthyroidal illness.

J A Franklyn1, E G Black, J Betteridge, M C Sheppard.   

Abstract

We compared serum TSH results determined in second and third generation assays in patients with thyroid disease and nonthyroidal illnesses (NTIs) to evaluate the usefulness of the more sensitive assay. We studied 19 subjects with untreated hyperthyroidism, 12 hyperthyroid subjects sampled at 4-week intervals after beginning carbimazole, 153 subjects receiving T4 replacement, and 300 hospital in-patients with a variety of NTIs. Serum TSH was measured, using a second generation immunometric method, together with free T4 and free T3. Samples with subnormal TSH (< 0.5 mU/L) were reassayed, using a more sensitive chemiluminescent immunometric method. Both assays revealed undetectable serum TSH levels in 18 of 19 overtly hyperthyroid patients. Undetectable TSH values (in both assays) were found in 30 of 33 patients with low serum TSH levels who were receiving treatment for hyperthyroidism, in association with normal thyroid hormone levels in 11. Undetectable TSH was evident in both patients receiving T4 and those with NTI, but use of the more sensitive assay led to a reduction in the number of subjects with undetectable TSH compared with the second generation results (T4-treated, 55 vs. 77 cases; NTI, 13 vs. 19 cases). There was a significant correlation between serum TSH and free T4 in the whole group on T4 (P < 0.001) and in those receiving T4 with low TSH (r = -0.33; P < 0.05); no significant correlation was evident in subjects with low serum TSH levels associated with NTI. An improvement in assay sensitivity led to a reduction in the number of patients being treated with T4 or with NTI in whom serum TSH was undetectable and, hence, an increase in those in whom overt hyperthyroidism could be excluded. Undetectable TSH results, even in a third generation assay, are not diagnostic of overt hyperthyroidism, but are also found in subjects with treated thyroid disease and NTI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8200938     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.78.6.8200938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  9 in total

1.  Thyroid function tests. Tests must still be done in possible thyroid dysfunction.

Authors:  P Kendall-Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-28

Review 2.  An update on diagnostic methods in the investigation of diseases of the thyroid.

Authors:  M J Reinhardt; E Moser
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-05

3.  Does an increase in the sensitivity of serum thyrotropin assays reduce diagnostic costs for thyroid disease in the community?

Authors:  M P Vanderpump; R H Neary; K Manning; R N Clayton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Diagnostic enigmas in thyroid disease.

Authors:  K A Woeber
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-02

5.  Thyrotropin dysregulation during a non-thyroidal illness: transient hypothalamic hypothyroidism?

Authors:  U M Kabadi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Clinical use of sensitive assays for thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Authors:  P A Masters; R J Simons
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Systemic illness.

Authors:  Marta Bondanelli; Maria Chiara Zatelli; Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Ettore C degli Uberti
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  Hyperthyroidism.

Authors:  Mala Sharma; Wilbert S Aronow; Laxesh Patel; Kaushang Gandhi; Harit Desai
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-04

9.  Laboratory policies and practices for thyroid function tests in Croatia: survey on behalf of Working Group for Laboratory Endocrinology of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

Authors:  Adriana Bokulić; Ivana Zec; Sanja Goreta; Nora Nikolac Gabaj; Marija Kocijančić; Tihana Serdar Hiršl; Anamarija Đuras; Mateja Troha; Lada Stanišić; Daniela Šupe-Domić; Sanda Jelisavac Ćosić; Koraljka Đurić; Domagoj Marijančević; Marija Siter Kuprešanin; Iva Lukić; Alenka Pezo; Jasna Leniček Krleža
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.515

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.