Literature DB >> 8200787

Does quality of life differ among headache diagnoses? Analysis using the medical outcomes study instrument.

G D Solomon1, F G Skobieranda, L A Gragg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the differences in quality of life associated with headache diagnoses using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-20).
METHODS: A patient interview survey using the SF-20 Short Form Health Survey was conducted in a headache clinic within a multi-specialty group practice. All six health components of the SF-20 were included in the study. Headache diagnoses were made using IHS criteria.
RESULTS: 208 consecutive headache patients were studied. Patients with cluster headache had a significantly higher (worse) pain score (P < 0.018) and higher percentage of patients with poor health due to pain (P < 0.005) than patients with migraine headache. There were fewer cluster patients with poor health associated with physical functioning than tension-type (P < 0.020) or mixed headache (P < 0.022) patients. Poor health associated with social functioning was greater for cluster (P < 0.011) and tension-type headache (P < 0.015) than for migraine. There was a significantly higher percentage of tension-type headache patients with poor health associated with mental health (P < 0.002) than patients with migraine.
CONCLUSIONS: The SF-20 is a reliable and valid measure of quality of life for patients with different headache diagnoses. Distinct headache diagnoses are marked by unique patterns of impairment and quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8200787     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1994.hed3403143.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Headache        ISSN: 0017-8748            Impact factor:   5.887


  12 in total

Review 1.  Quality-of-life assessment in patients with headache.

Authors:  G D Solomon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Burden of migraine. A review of its socioeconomic impact.

Authors:  G D Solomon; K L Price
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The psychiatric comorbidities of cluster headache.

Authors:  Matthew S Robbins
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-02

4.  Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  R K Parrish
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1996

Review 5.  Tension-type headache.

Authors:  Sait Ashina; Dimos D Mitsikostas; Mi Ji Lee; Nooshin Yamani; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Roberta Messina; Håkan Ashina; Dawn C Buse; Patricia Pozo-Rosich; Rigmor H Jensen; Hans-Christoph Diener; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 52.329

6.  MSQ: Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. Further investigation of the factor structure.

Authors:  P Jhingran; S M Davis; L M LaVange; D W Miller; R W Helms
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Psychosocial correlates and impact of chronic tension-type headaches.

Authors:  K A Holroyd; M Stensland; G L Lipchik; K R Hill; F S O'Donnell; G Cordingley
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 8.  Epidemiology of cluster headache.

Authors:  Susan W Broner; Joshua M Cohen
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2009-04

9.  The three dimensions of headache impact: pain, disability and affective distress.

Authors:  Kenneth A Holroyd; Peter Malinoski; Katherine M Davis; Gay L Lipchik
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.926

10.  Does complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use reduce negative life impact of headaches for chronic migraineurs? A national survey.

Authors:  Jieun Lee; Amrita Bhowmick; Amy Wachholtz
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.