Literature DB >> 8200669

Refractory period prolongation by biphasic defibrillator waveforms is associated with enhanced sodium current in a computer model of the ventricular action potential.

J L Jones1, R E Jones, K B Milne.   

Abstract

Mechanisms through which biphasic waveforms lower defibrillation threshold are unknown. Previous work showed that low-intensity biphasic shocks (BS2), delivered during the refractory period of a control action potential (S1), produced significantly longer responses than monophasic shocks (MS2). To test the hypothesis that longer responses are due to hyperpolarization-induced excitation channel recovery during the first portion of the biphasic waveform, we used the Beeler-Reuter ventricular action potential computer model with the Drouhard-Roberge (BRDR) modification to study refractory period stimulation with MS2 (10 msec) and symmetrical BS2 (10 msec each pulse). At 1.5 times diastolic threshold, BS2 prolonged action potential duration when delivered 50 msec into the S1 refractory period, and produced a maximum BS2 versus MS2 response duration difference of 62 msec. Longer BS2 responses corresponded to enhanced BS2-induced sodium current compared to MS2. Maximum BS2 vs MS2 sodium current difference was 400 uA/cm2. These results show that, in a computer model of the ventricular action potential, hyperpolarization by the first phase of a biphasic waveform enhances S2 sodium current and prolongs duration of refractory-period responses. This effectively shortens the cellular refractory period. Prolonged refractory period responses, produced by biphasic defibrillator waveforms, may underlie enhanced defibrillating efficacy at low shock intensities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8200669     DOI: 10.1109/10.277272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  6 in total

1.  Optical transmembrane potential recordings during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks.

Authors:  D M Clark; A E Pollard; R E Ideker; S B Knisley
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Entrainment by an extracellular AC stimulus in a computational model of cardiac tissue.

Authors:  J M Meunier; N A Trayanova; R A Gray
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-10

3.  Spatial heterogeneity of transmembrane potential responses of single guinea-pig cardiac cells during electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Vinod Sharma; Leslie Tung
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Mechanisms of cardiac cell excitation with premature monophasic and biphasic field stimuli: a model study.

Authors:  M G Fishler; E A Sobie; N V Thakor; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.