OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a wound monitoring program on infection rates after total joint arthroplasty. DESIGN: Case series, comparing postoperative wound infection rates before and after hospital discharge. SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: A group of 865 patients who underwent primary or revision total hip or knee arthroplasty between September 1989 and September 1991 followed by in-hospital and post-discharge wound monitoring was compared with a baseline group of 204 patients who had undergone an arthroplasty procedure and in-hospital wound monitoring between March and September 1988; only 38 of these patients were selected for post-discharge monitoring. INTERVENTIONS: In the study group, wounds were monitored every 48 to 72 hours to the time of patient discharge and at 30 days post-discharge. Monthly reports of surgeon-specific and overall infection rates were sent to each surgeon during both baseline and study periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of surgical wound infection. RESULTS: The initial overall wound infection rate was 9.9%. This decreased to 3.8% in the study group, after the wound monitoring program had been in place for at least 18 months. Post-discharge monitoring accounted for the majority of wound infections diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: A wound monitoring program may be an important tool in lowering wound infection rates associated with total joint arthroplasty. Post-discharge monitoring is important in determining true wound infection rates.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a wound monitoring program on infection rates after total joint arthroplasty. DESIGN: Case series, comparing postoperative wound infection rates before and after hospital discharge. SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: A group of 865 patients who underwent primary or revision total hip or knee arthroplasty between September 1989 and September 1991 followed by in-hospital and post-discharge wound monitoring was compared with a baseline group of 204 patients who had undergone an arthroplasty procedure and in-hospital wound monitoring between March and September 1988; only 38 of these patients were selected for post-discharge monitoring. INTERVENTIONS: In the study group, wounds were monitored every 48 to 72 hours to the time of patient discharge and at 30 days post-discharge. Monthly reports of surgeon-specific and overall infection rates were sent to each surgeon during both baseline and study periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of surgical wound infection. RESULTS: The initial overall wound infection rate was 9.9%. This decreased to 3.8% in the study group, after the wound monitoring program had been in place for at least 18 months. Post-discharge monitoring accounted for the majority of wound infections diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: A wound monitoring program may be an important tool in lowering wound infection rates associated with total joint arthroplasty. Post-discharge monitoring is important in determining true wound infection rates.
Authors: David J Leaper; Harry van Goor; Jacqueline Reilly; Nicola Petrosillo; Heinrich K Geiss; Antonio J Torres; Anne Berger Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.315