Literature DB >> 8199832

Reducing the loss of implants following penile prosthetic surgery.

M J Lynch1, G M Scott, J A Inglis, J P Pryor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the factors associated with loss of implant following penile prosthetic surgery and to make alterations in the management of patients to prevent this from occurring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out of the factors associated with post-operative infection and erosion in 188 patients who underwent implantation of penile prostheses. A prospective study was then established in which 62 patients were managed by a set protocol designed to counteract the factors identified as being contributory to loss of implants in the retrospective review.
RESULTS: In the retrospective study nine (4.8%) patients lost a prosthesis due to erosion. Erosion was noted to be more common with one type of implant which has since been modified. Infection was the cause of prosthesis loss in 12.2% of patients in the retrospective review. The new protocol resulted in a significantly reduced infection rate in penile prostheses to 1.6% (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: With attention to simple antiseptic prophylaxis, antibiotic penetration and continuing audit, a significant improvement in the loss of penile prostheses can be achieved along with a reduction in the amount of antibiotics prescribed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8199832     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07608.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  7 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie's disease and corporal fibrosis.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Premsant Sangkum; Ian Ross McCaslin; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio as a predictor of early penile prosthesis implant infection.

Authors:  Deniz Bolat; Yusuf Kadir Topcu; Ozgu Aydogdu; Suleyman Minareci; Cetin Dincel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Infection rate of penile prosthesis implants in men with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of available evidence.

Authors:  Daniele Tienforti; Maria Totaro; Luca Spagnolo; Francesca Di Giulio; Chiara Castellini; Giorgio Felzani; Marco Giorgio Baroni; Sandro Francavilla; Arcangelo Barbonetti
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 4.  Candida infections of medical devices.

Authors:  Erna M Kojic; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection.

Authors:  M Cakan; F Demirel; O Karabacak; F Yalçinkaya; U Altuğ
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Burak Arslan; Tarik Yonguc; Zafer Kozacıoglu; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Carvajal; Johana Benavides; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.