Literature DB >> 8196946

Outcome of low vision aid provision: the effectiveness of a low vision clinic.

S J Leat1, A Fryer, N J Rumney.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although there is an increasing need for primary low vision (LV) care, few studies have considered the success rates of optometric LV rehabilitation. We considered the objective success and perceived benefit obtained by 57 elderly LV patients.
METHOD: Tests of reading speed and questionnaires were administered in the patient's home after initial and follow-up visits to a LV clinic. Additional information was taken from the patient's clinic record.
RESULTS: Benefits from attending the clinic were reported by 89.5% of patients and 81% of patients were regularly using low vision aids (LVA's). There was a discrepancy between ability to read 1M print in the clinic (75% of patients) and the reported ability to read regular-sized print at home (35%). Perceived benefit from visiting the clinic was strongly associated with the ability to perform daily living tasks and to read 2M print. There was some association between perceived benefit and frequency of using the LVA's, but not with duration of use.
CONCLUSION: The results encourage a change in emphasis during LV assessments from sustained reading to the ability to perform daily living activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8196946     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199403000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  19 in total

1.  Head mounted video magnification devices for low vision rehabilitation: a comparison with existing technology.

Authors:  R Harper; L Culham; C Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Minimising the impact of visual impairment. Low vision aids are a simple way of alleviating impairment.

Authors:  T H Margrain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-05

3.  A revolution in Welsh low vision service provision.

Authors:  T H Margrain; B Ryan; J M Wild
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Low vision: a parochial view.

Authors:  C Dickinson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Abandonment of low-vision devices in an outpatient population.

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; K Bradley Kehler; Richard Jamara; Nicole Patterson; Denise Valenti; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Helping blind and partially sighted people to read: the effectiveness of low vision aids.

Authors:  T H Margrain
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Use of prescribed optical devices in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Dawn K Decarlo; Gerald McGwin; Karen Searcey; Liyan Gao; Marsha Snow; Lynne Stevens; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Low vision AIDS provision for visually impaired egyptian patients - a clinical outcome.

Authors:  Sherin Shaaban; Ahmad Rashid El-Lakkany; Ashraf Swelam; Ghada Anwar
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01

9.  Causes of low vision and their management at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, GHANA.

Authors:  E M Ackuaku-Dogbe; B Abaidoo; Z I Braimah; G Afenyo; S Asiedu
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

10.  Clinical and laboratory evaluation of peripheral prism glasses for hemianopia.

Authors:  Robert G Giorgi; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.