Literature DB >> 8195751

Radiographic identification of unknown human remains and interpreter experience level.

J P Hogge1, J M Messmer, Q N Doan.   

Abstract

The use of radiographs as a means of identification of unknown remains is a well-established method as performed by radiologists, forensic anthropologists, or pathologists. We devised a test to determine whether the degree of radiographic and medical knowledge of a film interpreter correlates with the degree of accuracy in making comparisons of radiographic unknowns. Three groups considered to be distinctly different in their level of medical knowledge and radiographic interpretive skills were chosen to evaluate forensic identification cases. Although all three groups identified a majority of cases correctly, none were completely accurate. The group with training in radiographic interpretation performed significantly better. Our study supports the need for trained interpreters in cases of forensic identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8195751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  5 in total

1.  Influence of the examiner's qualification and sources of error during stage determination of the medial clavicular epiphysis by means of computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel Wittschieber; Ronald Schulz; Volker Vieth; Martin Küppers; Thomas Bajanowski; Frank Ramsthaler; Klaus Püschel; Heidi Pfeiffer; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Reliability of Schmeling's stages of ossification of medial clavicular epiphyses and its validity to assess 18 years of age in living subjects.

Authors:  R Cameriere; S De Luca; D De Angelis; V Merelli; A Giuliodori; M Cingolani; C Cattaneo; L Ferrante
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Forensic age estimation based on development of third molars: a staging technique for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J De Tobel; I Phlypo; S Fieuws; C Politis; K L Verstraete; P W Thevissen
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Automated bone age assessment: motivation, taxonomies, and challenges.

Authors:  Marjan Mansourvar; Maizatul Akmar Ismail; Tutut Herawan; Ram Gopal Raj; Sameem Abdul Kareem; Fariza Hanum Nasaruddin
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 5.  Contributions of forensic anthropology to positive scientific identification: a critical Review.

Authors:  Douglas H Ubelaker; Austin Shamlou; Amanda Kunkle
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-10-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.