Literature DB >> 8194647

Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section.

M Stark1, A R Finkel.   

Abstract

Most surgeons adopt the Joel-Cohen method for opening the abdomen once they have become familiar with it. We present here, for the first time, a study comparing the post-operative outcome between the Joel-Cohen and the Pfannenstiel methods for opening the abdomen in cesarean section.

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 8194647     DOI： 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90218-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN： 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  4 in total

1.  Prospective, randomized, comparative study of Misgav Ladach versus traditional cesarean section at Nazareth Hospital, Kenya.

Authors:  L Ansaloni; R Brundisini; G Morino; A Kiura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Caesarean deliveries by Pfannenstiel versus Joel-Cohen incision: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wessam Magdy Abuelghar; Gasser El-Bishry; Lamiaa H Emam
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-12-01

3.  Maternal and fetal effect of misgav ladach cesarean section in nigerian women: a randomized control study.

Authors:  Oc Ezechi; Pm Ezeobi; Cv Gab-Okafor; A Edet; Ca Nwokoro; A Akinlade
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2013-10

4.  Added value of surgical interdisciplinarity- The Joel-Cohen's abdominal incision.

Authors:  Michael Stark; Kai Witzel; Tahar Benhidjeb; Sven Becker
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.