Literature DB >> 8192439

In vitro renal toxicity and in vivo therapeutic efficacy in experimental murine cryptococcosis of amphotericin B (Fungizone) associated with Intralipid.

V Joly1, R Farinotti, L Saint-Julien, M Chéron, C Carbon, P Yeni.   

Abstract

We compared the experimental toxicities and activities of deoxycholate amphotericin B (d-AmB) dissolved in glucose (Dd-AmB) or mixed with 20% Intralipid (ILd-AmB). In vitro, ILd-AmB against renal tubular cells in primary culture. In vivo, the toxicities and activities of Dd-AmB and ILd-AmB were studied in DBA2 mice with cryptococcosis. The maximum tolerated dose of intravenously administered d-AmB, i.e., the dose that induced less than 15% mortality because of toxicity, was 1.7 to 2.5 times higher when it was administered as ILd-AmB than when it was administered as Dd-AmB. Both treatments given intravenously at the same dose were equivalent for improving the survival of mice and reducing CFU counts in infected tissue, but at maximum tolerated doses, ILd-AmB (2 mg/kg of body weight) was more effective than Dd-AmB (0.8 to 1.2 mg/kg). AmB concentrations in spleen, liver, lung, and kidney were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography 4 and 24 h after a single injection of 1.2 mg of Dd-AmB per kg, 1.2 mg of ILd-AmB per kg, or 2 mg of ILd-AmB per kg. In a given organ, AmB levels were similar after administration of 1.2 mg of Dd-AmB or ILd-AmB per kg but were significantly higher after administration of 2 mg of ILd-AmB per kg. The lower level of toxicity of ILd-AmB might be explained by circular dichroism experiments, showing that ILd-AmB contained 10-fold less soluble oligomeric AmB, which is believed to be the toxic form of the drug, than Dd-AmB. We conclude that ILd-AmB is as efficient as Dd-AmB and is better tolerated than Dd-AmB in mice with experimental cryptococcosis. By allowing higher doses of AmB to be infused, Intralipid enhances AmB concentrations in infected sites, and thus the therapeutic activity of the drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8192439      PMCID: PMC284422          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.38.2.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  34 in total

1.  AMPHOTERICIN B RENAL TOXICITY IN THE DOG.

Authors:  W T BUTLER; G J HILL; C F SZWED; V KNIGHT
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.

Authors:  M M Bradford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  An experimental model of amphotericin B nephrotoxicity with renal tubular acidosis.

Authors:  T H Gouge; V T Andriole
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1971-11

4.  Efficacy of liposome-intercalated amphotericin B in the treatment of systemic candidiasis in mice.

Authors:  C Tremblay; M Barza; C Fiore; F Szoka
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Antifungal agents useful in therapy of systemic fungal infections.

Authors:  G Medoff; J Brajtburg; G S Kobayashi; J Bolard
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 13.820

6.  Treatment and prophylaxis of disseminated infection due to Candida albicans in mice with liposome-encapsulated amphotericin B.

Authors:  G Lopez-Berestein; R Mehta; R L Hopfer; K Mills; L Kasi; K Mehta; V Fainstein; M Luna; E M Hersh; R Juliano
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Antileishmanial activity of amphotericin and other antifungal agents entrapped in liposomes.

Authors:  R R New; M L Chance; S Heath
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Interaction of plasma proteins and lipoproteins with amphotericin B.

Authors:  J Brajtburg; S Elberg; J Bolard; G S Kobayashi; R A Levy; R E Ostlund; D Schlessinger; G Medoff
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Liposomal amphotericin B for the treatment of systemic fungal infections in patients with cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  G Lopez-Berestein; V Fainstein; R Hopfer; K Mehta; M P Sullivan; M Keating; M G Rosenblum; R Mehta; M Luna; E M Hersh
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 10.  Empiric amphotericin B therapy in patients with acute leukemia.

Authors:  W M Holleran; J R Wilbur; M W DeGregorio
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct
View more
  7 in total

1.  Amphotericin B in lipid emulsion: stability, compatibility, and in vitro antifungal activity.

Authors:  S Walker; S A Tailor; M Lee; L Louie; M Louie; A E Simor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Carrier effects on biological activity of amphotericin B.

Authors:  J Brajtburg; J Bolard
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Amphotericin B in children with malignant disease: a comparison of the toxicities and pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B administered in dextrose versus lipid emulsion.

Authors:  C E Nath; P J Shaw; R Gunning; A J McLachlan; J W Earl
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Serum pharmacology of amphotericin B applied in lipid emulsions.

Authors:  V Heinemann; B Kähny; U Jehn; D Mühlbayer; A Debus; K Wachholz; D Bosse; H J Kolb; W Wilmanns
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Effect of intralipid infusion on serum high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase, and lipoprotein lipase in tumor-bearing rats.

Authors:  K M Wasan; V B Grossie
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1995-03-15

6.  Safety and toxicity of amphotericin B in glucose 5% or intralipid 20% in neutropenic patients with pneumonia or fever of unknown origin: randomised study.

Authors:  P Schöffski; M Freund; R Wunder; D Petersen; C H Köhne; H Hecker; U Schubert; A Ganser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

7.  How can micelle systems be rebuilt by a heating process?

Authors:  Miguel Adelino da Silva-Filho; Scheyla Daniela Vieira da Silva Siqueira; Larissa Bandeira Freire; Ivonete Batista de Araújo; Káttya Gyselle de Holanda e Silva; Aldo da Cunha Medeiros; Irami Araújo-Filho; Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira; Eryvaldo Sócrates Tabosa do Egito
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-01-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.