Literature DB >> 8192301

Can we learn anything from small trials?

D L Sackett1, D J Cook.   

Abstract

In summary, then, we can learn three useful things from small clinical trials. First, we can learn when to challenge conventional but untested therapeutic wisdom. Second, because the patient number in any trial is the number of events, rather than the number of study patients, some small trials are so definitively positive that they are sufficient to identify the best therapy. And third, small trials, even when individually inconclusive, can serve as the basis for convincingly conclusive overviews and meta-analyses that carry, and deserve, greater credibility than a single large trial of similar size to their sum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8192301     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26331.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  8 in total

Review 1.  A review of randomised controlled trials published in Archives of Disease in Childhood from 1982-96.

Authors:  H Campbell; S A Surry; E M Royle
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography hyperamylasemia and acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Janusz Milewski; Grazyna Rydzewska; Malgorzata Degowska; Maciej Kierzkiewicz; Andrzej Rydzewski
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Dzherelo (Immunoxel) as adjunctive therapy to standard antituberculosis treatment in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  Marcel Kitenge; Bessie Phiri; Sara M Pheeha; Modupe Ogunrombi; Peter S Nyasulu
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26

4.  Where have all the pilot studies gone? A follow-up on 30 years of pilot studies in Clinical Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Navaldeep Kaur; Sabrina Figueiredo; Vanessa Bouchard; Carolina Moriello; Nancy Mayo
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Conditional equivalence testing: An alternative remedy for publication bias.

Authors:  Harlan Campbell; Paul Gustafson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in the top dental specialty journals is suboptimal.

Authors:  Mohammed I U Khan; Hartirath K Brar; Cynthia Y Sun; Rebecca He; Hussein A El-Khechen; Katie Mellor; Lehana Thabane; Carlos Quiñonez
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-10-04

7.  Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders.

Authors:  Nina U Robertson; Anel Schoonees; Amanda Brand; Janicke Visser
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-29

8.  Tailoring Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Subtypes of Voice-Hearing.

Authors:  David Smailes; Ben Alderson-Day; Charles Fernyhough; Simon McCarthy-Jones; Guy Dodgson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.