Literature DB >> 8192001

Intrarenal arterial Doppler sonography in the detection of renal vein thrombosis of the native kidney.

J F Platt1, J H Ellis, J M Rubin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies of transplant kidneys and recent reports on native kidneys have suggested intrarenal arterial Doppler findings can be helpful in the noninvasive workup of renal vein thrombosis. We used arterial Doppler sonography to evaluate cases of possible acute renal vein thrombosis in native kidneys that had equivocal results on standard Doppler analysis of the renal vein.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty native kidneys in 12 patients with clinical findings suggestive of acute renal vein thrombosis had Doppler studies of the main renal vein that failed to show normal flow. In all 20 kidneys, duplex Doppler study of arcuate/interlobar intrarenal arteries was done and the resistive index was determined. The Doppler findings were compared with subsequent findings on either renal venograms (n = 11) or MR images (n = 9), which served as the reference "gold" standards.
RESULTS: The prevalence of renal vein thrombosis was 25% (5/20). Ten kidneys had very abnormal findings on arterial Doppler studies (absent or reversed end-diastolic flow), but only two of these were proved to have renal vein thrombosis. In six other kidneys, end-diastolic flow was identified but the resistive index was still elevated (> or = 0.70), and only one of these kidneys was proved to have renal vein thrombosis. Four kidneys had normal arterial Doppler studies, and 50% (two) of these were proved to have renal vein thrombosis. When absent or reversed end-diastolic flow was used as a sign of renal vein thrombosis, intrarenal arterial Doppler analysis had a sensitivity of 40% (2/5) and a specificity of 47% (7/15).
CONCLUSION: Unlike the reported experience in transplanted kidneys, intrarenal arterial Doppler analysis is neither sensitive nor specific for renal vein thrombosis in native kidneys. An intrarenal arterial Doppler study with normal findings should not prevent further workup if Doppler findings in the renal vein are equivocal, nor should absent or reversed end-diastolic arterial signals be considered highly suggestive of renal vein thrombosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8192001     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.162.6.8192001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Acute renal venous obstruction is more detrimental to the kidney than arterial occlusion: implication for murine models of acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Manchang Liu; Djahida Bedja; Christopher Thoburn; Kathleen Gabrielson; Lorraine Racusen; Hamid Rabb
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2011-11-23

2.  The value of repeat kidney biopsy during an atypical course of membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Sumaiya Ahmed; David Massicotte-Azarniouch; Mark Canney; Clare Booth; Paula Blanco; Gregory L Hundemer
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.585

3.  Associations of renal vascular resistance with albuminuria and other macroangiopathy in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Kumiko Hamano; Ai Nitta; Takayasu Ohtake; Shuzo Kobayashi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Power Doppler imaging in acute renal vein occlusion and recanalization: a canine model.

Authors:  So-Young Yoo; In-One Kim; Young-Il Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Min Woo Lee; Byung Jae Youn; Woo Sun Kim; Kyung Mo Yeon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  Determinants and Prognostic Significance of the Renal Resistive Index.

Authors:  Nicholas Cauwenberghs; Tatiana Kuznetsova
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-09

6.  Non-contrast enhanced 3D SSFP MRA of the renal allograft vasculature: a comparison between radial linear combination and Cartesian inflow-weighted acquisitions.

Authors:  Eric M Bultman; Jessica Klaers; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Mark L Schiebler; Scott B Reeder; Walter F Block
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.130

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.