Literature DB >> 8190433

Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study.

B L Flamm1, J R Goings, Y Liu, G Wolde-Tsadik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a prospective multicenter comparison of outcomes of patients who attempted trial of labor and those who underwent elective repeat cesarean.
METHODS: During the study interval, all pregnant women with previous cesarean delivery cared for at Kaiser Permanente Hospitals in Southern California were studied regardless of whether trial of labor or elective repeat cesarean was planned.
RESULTS: Of 7229 study patients, 5022 (70%) had a trial of labor and 2207 had elective repeat cesarean operations. Seventy-five percent (3746) of those opting for trial of labor went on to deliver vaginally. The rate of uterine rupture was less than 1% and there were no maternal deaths related to uterine rupture. The hospital length of stay, incidence of postpartum transfusion, and incidence of postpartum fever were all significantly higher in the elective repeat cesarean group than in the trial of labor group.
CONCLUSIONS: Labor after previous cesarean delivery has a 75% success rate, with a risk of uterine rupture of less than 1%. Neither repeat cesarean delivery nor trial of labor is risk-free. With careful supervision, trial of labor eliminates the need for a large proportion of repeat cesarean operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8190433     DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199406000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  16 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Marian S McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Peggy Nygren; Benjamin K S Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

2.  The UTAH VBAC Study.

Authors:  Greg Gochnour; Stephen Ratcliffe; Mary Bishop Stone
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

3.  A two-year review of uterine rupture in a regional hospital.

Authors:  Co Fofie; P Baffoe
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2010-09

4.  Age-related changes in thickness of anterior lower uterine segment in normal singleton pregnancy during 20-35 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Yoshizato; Ibuki Kimura; Ryota Araki; Ayako Sanui; Fusanori Yotsumoto; Shingo Miyamoto
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort.

Authors:  Sharon A Gilbert; William A Grobman; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Dwight J Rouse; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Ravi M Patel; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.300

7.  Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section: a decision analysis.

Authors:  J H Chuang; R A Jenders
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

8.  Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kim J Cox
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Remote prognosis after primary cesarean delivery: the association of VBACs and recurrent cesarean deliveries with maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Offer Erez; Lena Novack; Vered Kleitman-Meir; Doron Dukler; Idit Erez-Weiss; Francesca Gotsch; Moshe Mazor
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-03-14

10.  "Endoview" project of intrapartum endoscopy.

Authors:  Boris M Petrikovsky; Steven Ravens
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.