Literature DB >> 8189570

Small high grade adenocarcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable disease: pathogenetic and clinical implications.

J I Epstein1, M J Carmichael, A W Partin, P C Walsh.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that poorly differentiated areas in prostatic carcinoma evolve from more well differentiated cancer with time and increasing tumor volume. However, the association of high grade tumor with increasing tumor volume may merely reflect a growth advantage of the high grade tumor, whereby most high grade tumors would be large by the time they were clinically detected. Prior reports analyzing the relationship of tumor volume and grade suffer from studying fairly advanced tumors in which the relationship of tumor volume and grade at inception of prostate cancer could not be addressed. We evaluated 720 individual tumor foci in 153 radical prostatectomy specimens removed for early prostate cancer detected by screening techniques. Although tumor volume was related to grade, the correlation was weak (r = 0.254). Of 13 peripherally located high grade tumors (Gleason score 8 to 10) 6 (46%) were less than 1 cc. Of 106 peripheral tumors with some Gleason pattern 4 or 5 component 48 (45%) were less than 1 cc. These small high grade tumors were frequently associated with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Small high grade cancers were uncommon within the transition zone, where there exists a greater tendency for large low grade cancers to arise. In this radical prostatectomy series of nonpalpable prostate cancer 9% of the prostates contained tumor foci that were predominantly Gleason pattern 4 or 5 and that measured 1 cc or less. Based on these findings, if some patients with low to intermediate grade cancer are to be followed expectantly, they should undergo widespread sampling of the prostate to enhance the detection of multifocal small high grade disease. The finding of a large proportion of low volume, high grade carcinoma reveals that prostate cancer has the potential to be high grade early in its course and need not arise from low grade carcinoma that has evolved with time and volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8189570     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35309-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

Review 1.  Methods for volume assessment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Corvin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Epigenetic susceptibility factors for prostate cancer with aging.

Authors:  N A Damaschke; B Yang; S Bhusari; J P Svaren; D F Jarrard
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Does screening for prostate cancer identify clinically important disease?

Authors:  M R Feneley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Determining prostate cancer-specific death through quantification of stromogenic carcinoma area in prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Gustavo E Ayala; Bahar Muezzinoglu; Kai H Hammerich; Anna Frolov; Hao Liu; Peter T Scardino; Rile Li; Mohammad Sayeeduddin; Michael M Ittmann; Dov Kadmon; Brian J Miles; Thomas M Wheeler; David R Rowley
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Change in prostate cancer grade over time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease.

Authors:  Todd B Sheridan; H Ballentine Carter; Wenle Wang; Patricia B Landis; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Aging and cancer-related loss of insulin-like growth factor 2 imprinting in the mouse and human prostate.

Authors:  Vivian X Fu; Joseph R Dobosy; Joshua A Desotelle; Nima Almassi; Jonathan A Ewald; Rajini Srinivasan; Mark Berres; John Svaren; Richard Weindruch; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Molecular Pathology of High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Levent Trabzonlu; Ibrahim Kulac; Qizhi Zheng; Jessica L Hicks; Michael C Haffner; William G Nelson; Karen S Sfanos; Onur Ertunc; Tamara L Lotan; Christopher M Heaphy; Alan K Meeker; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  Heterogeneity in intratumor distribution of p53 mutations in human prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Mirchandani; J Zheng; G J Miller; A K Ghosh; D K Shibata; R J Cote; P Roy-Burman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Biochemical recurrence in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer in korean men: significance of the primary Gleason grade.

Authors:  Yun Kwan Ro; Sangchul Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.