Literature DB >> 8189348

Individual differences in intraperson variability in mood.

L A Penner1, S Shiffman, J A Paty, B A Fritzsche.   

Abstract

The experience sampling method and palm-top computers were used to obtain 75-100 randomly timed in situ assessments of 11 mood-related items from 54 Ss over 12-14 days. The variability in the distribution of an S's responses to each item was used as an estimate of intrasubject mood variability. Mood variability was stable across time (average r > .58) and across situations (average r = .51). The intercorrelations among the individual item variabilities were also substantial (average r = .41); when the items were combined into a mood variability scale, the coefficient alpha was .84. The stability and internal consistency of mood variability could not be reasonably attributed to similarity in item valences, differences among the Ss in the situations they encountered, response biases, or response errors. It was concluded that mood variability is a stable personal characteristic, but additional analyses suggested that it may be independent from other kinds of intraperson variability.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8189348     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.4.712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  17 in total

1.  A Monte Carlo simulation study of the reliability of intraindividual variability.

Authors:  Ryne Estabrook; Kevin J Grimm; Ryan P Bowles
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-01-23

2.  An application of a mixed-effects location scale model for analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data.

Authors:  Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein; Hakan Demirtas
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  When is affect variability bad for health? The association between affect variability and immune response to the influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Brooke N Jenkins; John F Hunter; Marie P Cross; Amanda M Acevedo; Sarah D Pressman
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Physicians' Use of Patients' Daily Reports of Quality of Life to Evaluate Treatment Response in Phase I Cancer Trials.

Authors:  Felicity W K Harper; Elisabeth I Heath; Marci E J Gleason; Louis Penner; Patricia Lorusso; Ding Wang; Terrance L Albrecht
Journal:  J Cancer Ther       Date:  2012-10

5.  Trauma exposure and heavy drinking and drug use among college students: Identifying the roles of negative and positive affect lability in a daily diary study.

Authors:  Nicole H Weiss; Krysten W Bold; Ateka A Contractor; Tami P Sullivan; Stephen Armeli; Howard Tennen
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect.

Authors:  Sien Deng; Danielle E McCarthy; Megan E Piper; Timothy B Baker; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  The Role of Response Styles in the Assessment of Intraindividual Personality Variability.

Authors:  Brendan M Baird; Richard E Lucas; M Brent Donnellan
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2016-06-23

8.  Methodological Overview of A Self-Determination Theory-Based Computerized Intervention to Promote Leisure-Time Physical Activity.

Authors:  Heather Patrick; Amy Canevello
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2011-01

9.  Mood variability and cigarette smoking escalation among adolescents.

Authors:  Sally M Weinstein; Robin Mermelstein; Saul Shiffman; Brian Flay
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2008-12

10.  Modeling mood variation associated with smoking: an application of a heterogeneous mixed-effects model for analysis of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data.

Authors:  Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein; Michael L Berbaum; Richard T Campbell
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.