Literature DB >> 8185519

Ocular manifestations of leprosy in a noninstitutionalized community in the United States.

M R Dana1, M A Hochman, M A Viana, C H Hill, J Sugar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to delineate the epidemiologic and clinical patterns of ocular leprosy in an outpatient setting in the United States.
DESIGN: Examinations were performed in 61 consecutive outpatients seen in a Midwestern leprosy clinic. PATIENTS: Forty-three male and 18 female patients were examined. The patients' origins included Southeast Asia (24 patients [39%]), Latin America (23 patients [38%]), India (nine patients [15%]), Europe or North America (two patients [3%]), Africa (two patients [3%]), and the Middle East (one patient [2%]).
RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of patients were classified as having polar lepromatous leprosy; 18%, borderline lepromatous leprosy; 3%, borderline borderline leprosy; 36%, borderline tuberculoid leprosy; 2%, polar tuberculoid leprosy; and 2%, indeterminate leprosy. Ninety-six percent of patients had a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Ocular findings included madarosis (28 patients [46%]), subconjunctival fibrosis (18 patients [30%]), punctate epithelial keratopathy (17 patients [28%]), posterior subcapsular cataract (10 patients [16%]), corneal hypesthesia (10 patients [16%]), lagophthalmos (seven patients [11%]), corneal pannus (six patients [10%]), entropion (five patients [8%]), prominent or beaded corneal nerves (four patients [7%]), iridocyclitis (four patients [7%]), focal avascular keratitis (three patients [5%]), scleritis (three patients [5%]), interstitial keratitis (two patients [3%]), iris pearls (two patients [3%]), and ocular clofazimine crystals (two patients [3%]). Madarosis, corneal hypesthesia, and posterior subcapsular cataracts were significantly associated with disease duration (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: We report herein a relatively low frequency of visual impairment attributable to leprosy in our series compared with that seen among institutionalized leprous patients. However, since 48% of subjects had one or more sight-threatening complications as a result of their disease, a program of regular ophthalmic follow-up is strongly advocated for all patients with leprosy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8185519     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090170070025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  5 in total

1.  Limbal leproma in lepromatous leprosy.

Authors:  Irimpan Lazar Francis; Nadir Ali Mohamed Ali; Pemasiri Upali Telisinghe; Nayan Joshi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Ocular leprosy in institutionalized Nigerian patients.

Authors:  J A Ebeigbe; F Kio
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2011-06

3.  The prevalence of ocular complications in leprosy patients seen in the United Kingdom over a period of 21 years.

Authors:  A N J Malik; R W Morris; T J Ffytche
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Leprosy Presenting with Iridocyclitis: A Diagnostic Dilemma.

Authors:  Jaya Kaushik; Vaibhav Kumar Jain; Jitendra Kumar Singh Parihar; Sanjay Dhar; Savita Agarwal
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

5.  Bilateral madarosis as the solitary presenting feature of multibacillary leprosy.

Authors:  Ajay Krishnan; Sumit Kar
Journal:  Int J Trichology       Date:  2012-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.