Literature DB >> 8183656

Test of the Health Promotion Model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection.

S L Lusk1, D L Ronis, M J Kerr, J R Atwood.   

Abstract

The Health Promotion Model (HPM) was tested as a causal model to predict workers' use of hearing protection (N = 645). Measures indicated an excellent fit of the theoretical model. The exploratory analyses found the same cognitive-perceptual factors most important in predicting use. However, in contrast to the theoretical model, two modifying factors (job category and situational factors) had direct effects on use. The hypothesized model accounted for 49.3% of variance and the exploratory models accounted for 50.7% to 52.7% of variance in hearing protection use. Results of testing the HPM are consistent with the recently proposed revision of the model by Pender, Walker, Frank-Stromborg, and Sechrist (1990a, 1990b). The strongest effects on behavior came from the behavior-specific influences and demographic characteristics. Situational factors had a direct effect on the health behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8183656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  9 in total

1.  A multi-component intervention to promote hearing protector use among construction workers.

Authors:  Noah S Seixas; Rick Neitzel; Bert Stover; Lianne Sheppard; Bill Daniell; Jane Edelson; Hendrika Meischke
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.

Authors:  Jane Edelson; Richard Neitzel; Hendrika Meischke; William Daniell; Lianne Sheppard; Bert Stover; Noah Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-06-16

3.  Perceived difficulty quitting predicts enrollment in a smoking-cessation program for patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Sonia A Duffy; Angela L Scheumann; Karen E Fowler; Cynthia Darling-Fisher; Jeffrey E Terrell
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers.

Authors:  Olivier Doutres; Jonathan Terroir; Caroline Jolly; Chantal Gauvin; Laurence Martin; Alessia Negrini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Indicators of hearing protection use: self-report and researcher observation.

Authors:  Stephanie C Griffin; Richard Neitzel; William E Daniell; Noah S Seixas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; Tanima Banerjee; Michael A Cohen; James J Yang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of hearing protection interventions for farm operators.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; David L Ronis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  How does gender influence the recognition of cardiovascular risk and adherence to self-care recommendations?: A study in Polish primary care.

Authors:  Ireneusz Szymczyk; Ewa Wojtyna; Witold Lukas; Joanna Kępa; Teresa Pawlikowska
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; Tanima Banerjee; James J Yang; Janice Bernick; Sonia Duffy; Richard Redman
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.