Literature DB >> 8182764

Comparison of topoisomerase I inhibition, DNA damage, and cytotoxicity of camptothecin derivatives presently in clinical trials.

A Tanizawa1, A Fujimori, Y Fujimori, Y Pommier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Camptothecins belong to a group of anticancer agents with a unique mechanism of action: poisoning of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I. Two camptothecin derivatives, topotecan (TPT) and CPT-11, are in clinical trials and their chemotherapeutic efficacy appears promising.
PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare simultaneously the molecular and cellular pharmacology of the various camptothecin derivatives that are presently in clinical trials.
METHODS: Cytotoxicity of drugs toward human colon carcinoma HT-29 cells was determined by colony-forming assays. DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) were measured by alkaline elution. Drug potency to induce topoisomerase 1-mediated DNA cleavage and the sequence selectivity of the breaks were determined by sequencing gel autoradiography.
RESULTS: SN-38 and CPT were more cytotoxic than 9-AC and TPT, and CPT-11 was almost inactive toward HT-29 cells. IC50 values were 8.8 nM for SN-38, 10 nM for CPT, 19 nM for 9-AC, 33 nM for TPT, and greater than 100 nM for CPT-11. In drug-induced DNA damage measured by alkaline elution drug concentrations producing 1000-rad-equivalents (C1000), values were 0.037 microM for SN-38, 0.051 microM for CPT, 0.085 microM for 9-AC, 0.28 microM for TPT, and greater than 1 microM for CPT-11. SN-38 remained the most potent compound in isolated nuclei, and CPT-11 was still inactive. The potency ranking was the same as in whole cells, and the C1000 values were 0.0025 microM for SN-38, 0.012 microM for CPT, 0.021 microM for 9-AC, 0.44 microM for TPT, and greater than 0.1 microM for CPT-11. Potency difference between SN-38 and the other compounds was greater in isolated nuclei than in whole cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Kinetics of the reversal of drug-induced SSB in isolated nuclei suggest that dissociation of SN-38 from cleavable complexes is much slower than that of CPT. Cleavage patterns of CPT and 9-AC were similar but differed from those of TPT and SN-38. Although in vitro analyses do not necessarily reflect chemotherapeutic efficacy, this study found that SN-38 is the most potent compound and that 9-AC and TPT are less active than CPT in this system. The effect of CPT-11 is minimal. Therefore, the clinical activity of CPT-11 may strongly depend on its hydrolysis to SN-38. Differences in DNA sequence selectivity and the stability of cleavable complexes induced by the drugs may also contribute to differences among CPT derivatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8182764     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/86.11.836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  56 in total

1.  Molecular and cellular pharmacology of the novel noncamptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitor Genz-644282.

Authors:  Dhriti Sooryakumar; Thomas S Dexheimer; Beverly A Teicher; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  MM3(96) parameterization for camptothecin analogs: an ab initio and molecular mechanics study.

Authors:  S W Carrigan; J H Lii; J P Bowen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular modeling studies of 20-(S)-camptothecin analogs as inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase I and anticancer/antitumor agents.

Authors:  S W Carrigan; P C Fox; M E Wall; M C Wani; J P Bowen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  3D superhydrophobic electrospun meshes as reinforcement materials for sustained local drug delivery against colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Stefan T Yohe; Victoria L M Herrera; Yolonda L Colson; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Metabolic pathways of the camptothecin analog AR-67.

Authors:  Jamie Horn; Marta Milewska; Susanne M Arnold; Markos Leggas
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.

Authors:  G G Chabot
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Differential sensitization of two human colon cancer cell lines to the antitumor effects of irinotecan combined with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine.

Authors:  Shuko Hakata; Jun Terashima; Yu Shimoyama; Kouji Okada; Shiho Fujioka; Erika Ito; Wataru Habano; Shogo Ozawa
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Drugging topoisomerases: lessons and challenges.

Authors:  Yves Pommier
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.100

9.  PEGylated nanographene oxide for delivery of water-insoluble cancer drugs.

Authors:  Zhuang Liu; Joshua T Robinson; Xiaoming Sun; Hongjie Dai
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: slow but further progress.

Authors:  Yeul Hong Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.