Literature DB >> 8181550

Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion.

P H Buschang1, J Stroud, R G Alexander.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate differences in dental arch morphology among an orthodontic sample of 386 untreated adult females between 17 and 68 years of age, categorized by age group (17-25 years, 26-35 years, or 35+ years) and malocclusion (Class I, Class II division 1, or Class II division 2). The results show that both maxillary and mandibular dental arch size were significantly larger for the younger age group. Arch shape was relatively shorter and wider for the oldest age group. Palatal height was greatest for the youngest age group and least for the oldest group. Subjects with Class II malocclusion had significantly smaller arches, greater maxillary incisor irregularity, and less mandibular incisor irregularity than patients with Class I malocclusion. Subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusion had greater palatal heights and relatively longer/narrower maxillary dental arches than subjects with Class II division 2 malocclusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8181550     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/16.1.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Dental archforms in dentoalveolar Class I, II and III.

Authors:  Martina Slaj; Stjepan Spalj; Dubravko Pavlin; Davor Illes; Mladen Slaj
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The relationship between mandibular arch length and widths in a sample of Yemeni subjects with normal dento-Skeletal relationship.

Authors:  Nabil Muhsen Al-Zubair
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2013-10

3.  Pathognomonic features of Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion: A comparative cephalometric and arch width study.

Authors:  Singamsetty E R V Prasad; Ravikishore Reddy Indukuri; Rupesh Singh; Anitha Nooney; Firoz Babu Palagiri; Veera Narayana
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-12

4.  Determinant factors of Yemeni maxillary arch dimensions.

Authors:  Nabil Muhsen Al-Zubair
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2014-10-22

5.  Diagnostic features of Angle's Class II div 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  Kiran Kumar Dodda; Singamsetty E R V Prasad; Ravi Krishna Kanuru; Siddhartha Nalluri; Radhika Mittapalli
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

6.  Prediction of Class II improvement after rapid maxillary expansion in early mixed dentition.

Authors:  Alberto Caprioglio; Chiara Bergamini; Lorenzo Franchi; Nicolò Vercellini; Piero Antonio Zecca; Riccardo Nucera; Rosamaria Fastuca
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic patients during initial therapy with conventional brackets or self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Tai-Ting Lai; Jeng-Yuan Chiou; Tai-Cheng Lai; Ted Chen; Min-Huey Chen
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.080

Review 8.  Changes in the Mandible Following Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Children with Class II Malocclusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Małgorzata Kotarska; Nazan Kucukkeles; Joanna Lis; Beata Kawala; Kornelia Rumin; Michał Sarul
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-11

9.  Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population.

Authors:  Dolly Patel; Falguni Mehta; Nimesh Patel; Nishit Mehta; Ipist Trivedi; Apexa Mehta
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.