Literature DB >> 8181410

History and examination in the assessment of patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence.

J Hill1, R J Corson, H Brandon, J Redford, E B Faragher, E S Kiff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to identify those factors from the history and examination which might predict the pathophysiologic basis of idiopathic fecal incontinence.
METHODS: In a prospective study of 237 patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence (female to male, 7:1.7; mean age, 54.8 years; median history, 3 years), history, examination, and anorectal physiology studies findings have been analyzed using contingency table analysis.
RESULTS: In patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence, anorectal physiology studies have shown that a low maximum basal pressure (< 45 cm H2O) is predominantly attributable to internal and sphincter weakness, and low maximum squeezing pressure (< 76 cm H2O) is indicative of voluntary sphincter deficiency. In this study, a low maximum basal pressure is correlated with leakage, gaping of the anus on traction of the anal verge, and decreased resting tone on digital examination (all P < 0.05). A low maximum squeezing pressure is correlated with incontinence en route to the lavatory, urgency, both stress and urge incontinence of urine, reduced voluntary contraction in the external anal sphincter and puborectalis on digital examination, and a reduced or absent anorectal angle (all P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study has shown that an informed history and digital examination can predict the manometric findings of specialist anorectal physiology studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8181410     DOI: 10.1007/bf02076194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  The probability of finding nerve branches to the external anal sphincter.

Authors:  Leszek Stefanski; Paweł Lampe; Ryszard Aleksandrowicz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 2.  Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  G Gallo; J Martellucci; G Pellino; R Ghiselli; A Infantino; F Pucciani; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Poor outcome of sphincter repair: an evacuation problem?

Authors:  H B Michelsen; P Christensen; S Buntzen; S Laurberg; K Krogh
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Advances in diagnostic assessment of fecal incontinence and dyssynergic defecation.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  An Evidence-Based Approach to the Evaluation, Diagnostic Assessment and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2014-09

6.  Functional Anorectal Disorders.

Authors:  Satish Sc Rao; Adil E Bharucha; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Richelle Felt-Bersma; Charles Knowles; Allison Malcolm; Arnold Wald
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Annette C Dobben; Maaike P Terra; Marije Deutekom; Michael F Gerhards; A Bart Bijnen; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Lucas W M Janssen; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.