Literature DB >> 8181407

Results of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse.

A Senapati1, R J Nicholls, J P Thomson, R K Phillips.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the results of Delorme's procedure.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients (24 males and 8 females, mean age, 70 years) underwent Delorme's procedure between 1978 and 1990 following symptoms lasting between two weeks and ten years. Thirteen patients had had 21 previous operations for prolapse.
RESULTS: The mean operation time was 65 minutes. No blood transfusions were needed, there was no operative mortality, and only two patients had complications (one chest infection and one anastomotic dehiscence). No patients were lost to follow-up. Over a mean follow-up of 24 months (4 months to 4 years), 9 patients died of unrelated conditions. There were four recurrences (12.5 percent), two in patients who had each had two previous procedures. Incontinence improved in 46 percent. No patient became constipated and 50 percent of those constipated preoperatively improved.
CONCLUSION: Although abdominal rectopexy is safe and has a low recurrence rate (< 5 percent), it involves the hazards of a laparotomy. In addition, up to 40 percent of patients become constipated after rectopexy which may be debilitating. Delorme's procedure has a low morbidity, results in good bowel function, and has a low recurrence rate. It can be performed on unfit patients with possible advantages over rectopexy and perhaps should be used more readily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8181407     DOI: 10.1007/bf02076191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  21 in total

1.  [Rectal prolapse in adults].

Authors:  W Heitland
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Scott D Goldstein; Pinckney J Maxwell
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

4.  Digital assessment of lower rectum fixity in rectal prolapse (DALR): a simple clinical anatomical test to determine the most suitable approach (abdominal versus perineal) for repair.

Authors:  Deya Marzouk; Michael J Ramdass; Amyn Haji; Mansoor Akhtar
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Isolated rectal diverticulum complicating with rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction: case report.

Authors:  Chuang-Wei Chen; Shu-Wen Jao; Huang-Jen Lai; Ying-Chun Chiu; Jung-Cheng Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Delorme's Procedure for Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse; Does it Alter Anorectal Function.

Authors:  Sabry A Mahmoud; Waleed Omar; Kamal Abdel-Elah; Mohamed Farid
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Posterior sagittal approach for mesh rectopexy as a management of complete rectal in adults.

Authors:  Yehia Kosba; Walid Galal Elshazly; Walid Abd El Maksoud
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Perineal approaches to rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Mari A Madsen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

9.  Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Abdominal Rectopexy and Delorme's Procedure for Rectal Prolapse: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Hemanth Makineni; Poornachandra Thejeswi; B K Shivprasad Rai
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

10.  Complete rectal prolapse in adults: clinical and functional results of Delrome procedure combined with postanal repair.

Authors:  Nabil Hamrah; Ayman Algadaa; Yahyia Alashry
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2011-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.