Literature DB >> 8181285

No differences in hemodynamics, ventricular function, and oxygen delivery in septic and nonseptic patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome.

J J Ronco1, A Belzberg, P T Phang, K R Walley, P M Dodek, J A Russell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are differences in hemodynamics, ventricular function, oxygen delivery, and oxygen consumption between septic and nonseptic patients who have the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
DESIGN: Cohort analytic study.
SETTING: Tertiary care medical and surgical intensive care unit, university hospital. PATIENTS: Eighteen septic (survivors, n = 8; nonsurvivors, n = 10) and 14 nonseptic (survivors, n = 7; nonsurvivors, n = 7) patients studied within 24 hrs of the diagnosis of ARDS.
INTERVENTIONS: Simultaneous hemodynamic, radionuclide cineangiographic, and oxygen delivery and consumption measurements.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cardiac index, right and left ventricular ejection fractions, end-diastolic volume indices, oxygen delivery, and oxygen consumption were measured. There were no differences in mean systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, right and left ventricular ejection fractions, end-diastolic volumes, and oxygen delivery and consumption between septic and nonseptic patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Early in the course of ARDS, there were no differences in hemodynamics, ventricular function, and oxygen delivery and consumption between septic and nonseptic patients. Sepsis does not account for the previously reported differences in hemodynamics, ventricular function, and oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption between survivors and non-survivors of ARDS. We speculate that both ARDS and sepsis cause release of mediators which cause similar changes in hemodynamics, ventricular function, and oxygen delivery and consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8181285     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199405000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  1 in total

Review 1.  The prognosis of ARDS: appropriate optimism?

Authors:  F Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.440

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.