BACKGROUND: Noninvasive cardiac-specific analysis of contractile function in patients with dilated heart failure remains problematic. This study tests whether maximal power divided by the square of end-diastolic volume (PWRmx/EDV2, or preload-adjusted PWRmx) can provide such assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: To validate the load insensitivity of the PWRmx index and determine its response to contractile change, 24 subjects with chronic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent invasive pressure-volume catheterization study using the conductance catheter technique. Preload was transiently reduced by 30% using balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava, and afterload impedance was lowered by 50%, induced by a bolus injection of nitroglycerin. Contractile state was varied by intravenous dobutamine, verapamil, or esmolol. PWRmx was calculated from the simultaneous product of ventricular pressure and rate of volume change (dV/dt), the latter derived from the volume catheter signal. PWRmx varied directly with preload but was minimally influenced by afterload. However, PWRmx/EDV2 was not significantly altered by either loading change. PWRmx/EDV2 did vary with contractility, correlating closely with changes in the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (r = .91, P < .001). To test the noninvasive application of this index, 12 additional patients were studied, with PWRmx/EDV2 derived from nuclear ventriculography combined with a novel method to measure central arterial pressures. Subjects received intravenous nitroprusside or dobutamine in random order. Ejection fraction increased similarly with both agents (+42.9 +/- 8.9% for dobutamine and +29.4 +/- 5.3% for nitroprusside, both P < .01). In contrast, PWRmx/EDV2 did not significantly change with nitroprusside but increased by 126 +/- 16.1% with dobutamine (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Preload-adjusted PWRmx is a steady-state index of ventricular systolic function that is sensitive to inotropic state and minimally influenced by physiological changes in afterload impedance or volume load. It appears useful for noninvasive cardiac-specific analysis of acute drug effects.
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive cardiac-specific analysis of contractile function in patients with dilated heart failure remains problematic. This study tests whether maximal power divided by the square of end-diastolic volume (PWRmx/EDV2, or preload-adjusted PWRmx) can provide such assessment. METHODS AND RESULTS: To validate the load insensitivity of the PWRmx index and determine its response to contractile change, 24 subjects with chronic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent invasive pressure-volume catheterization study using the conductance catheter technique. Preload was transiently reduced by 30% using balloon occlusion of the inferior vena cava, and afterload impedance was lowered by 50%, induced by a bolus injection of nitroglycerin. Contractile state was varied by intravenous dobutamine, verapamil, or esmolol. PWRmx was calculated from the simultaneous product of ventricular pressure and rate of volume change (dV/dt), the latter derived from the volume catheter signal. PWRmx varied directly with preload but was minimally influenced by afterload. However, PWRmx/EDV2 was not significantly altered by either loading change. PWRmx/EDV2 did vary with contractility, correlating closely with changes in the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (r = .91, P < .001). To test the noninvasive application of this index, 12 additional patients were studied, with PWRmx/EDV2 derived from nuclear ventriculography combined with a novel method to measure central arterial pressures. Subjects received intravenous nitroprusside or dobutamine in random order. Ejection fraction increased similarly with both agents (+42.9 +/- 8.9% for dobutamine and +29.4 +/- 5.3% for nitroprusside, both P < .01). In contrast, PWRmx/EDV2 did not significantly change with nitroprusside but increased by 126 +/- 16.1% with dobutamine (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Preload-adjusted PWRmx is a steady-state index of ventricular systolic function that is sensitive to inotropic state and minimally influenced by physiological changes in afterload impedance or volume load. It appears useful for noninvasive cardiac-specific analysis of acute drug effects.
Authors: Navin K Kapur; Lara Reyelt; Paige Crowley; Lauren Richey; John McCarthy; Shiva Annamalai; Sarah Newman; Lena Jorde; Sina Forotuanjazi; Allen Razavi; Tim Lenihan; Daniel Burkhoff; Richard H Karas Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Barry A Borlaug; Gregory D Lewis; Steven E McNulty; Marc J Semigran; Martin LeWinter; Horng Chen; Grace Lin; Anita Deswal; Kenneth B Margulies; Margaret M Redfield Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Barry A Borlaug; Thomas P Olson; Carolyn S P Lam; Kelly S Flood; Amir Lerman; Bruce D Johnson; Margaret M Redfield Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hani N Sabbah; Carlo Gabriele Tocchetti; Mengjun Wang; Samantapudi Daya; Ramesh C Gupta; Richard S Tunin; Reza Mazhari; Eiki Takimoto; Nazareno Paolocci; Douglas Cowart; Wilson S Colucci; David A Kass Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: M Takagaki; P M McCarthy; M Chung; J Connor; R Dessoffy; Y Ochiai; M Howard; K Doi; M Kopcak; T N Mazgalev; K Fukamachi Journal: Heart Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.994