Literature DB >> 817898

Extrapolation of experimental data from animals to man.

G N Krasovskii.   

Abstract

Conditions for extrapolating toxicologic data from animals to man were studied. In the search for general regularities associated with the comparative sensitivity of humans and various species of animals to toxins, it was shown that the toxicity parameters of compounds and the biological constants of mammals correlate with body weight. This relationship is well described by a rectilinear regression equation which holds for more than 100 of the most diverse mammalian biological constants. The toxicity parameters for 80% of the substances also are subordinated to this regularity. This made it possible to develop a computational method for extrapolating toxicologic data from animals to the "average" man. In order to increase the reliability of extrapolation, it is necessary to take into consideration the limits of variability of sensitivity of various population contingents to the effect of chemical compounds, estimate the accuracy of establishing the threshold and no-effect doses of substances under chronic experiment conditions with animals and determine the maximally possible error associated with extrapolating experimental data to the "average" man. In this respect, it is advisable to use a coefficient of reserve whose value should not be less than 10 in order to ensure safe conditions for the transfer of the results of toxicologic studies to public health practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 817898      PMCID: PMC1474992          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.761351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  7 in total

1.  Scaling toxicity data across species.

Authors:  W R Chappell
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Pharmacokinetics of OpdA, an organophosphorus hydrolase, in the African green monkey.

Authors:  Colin J Jackson; Colin Scott; Angela Carville; Keith Mansfield; David L Ollis; Steven B Bird
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  Physiological pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  K B Bischoff
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Cyclopentenyl cytosine: interspecies predictions based on rodent plasma and urine kinetics.

Authors:  D S Zaharko; J A Kelley; J E Tomaszewski; L Hegedus; N R Hartman
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Strategy for the assessment of neurobehavioral consequences of environmental factors.

Authors:  H A Tilson; P A Cabe
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Soviet-American cooperation in environmental health science.

Authors:  P E Schambra; D P Rall; G I Sidorenko; M A Pinigin; N N Litvinov
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment--sufficient protection against mixture effects?

Authors:  Olwenn V Martin; Scholze Martin; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.