Literature DB >> 8178899

Sex hormone receptor binding, progestin selectivity, and the new oral contraceptives.

D C Collins1.   

Abstract

The desired biologic effect of progestins used in OCs is progestational activity. Undesired pharmacologic properties such as androgenic activity are not necessary for contraception and increase the potential for adverse effects. A selective progestin has progestational effects at relatively low concentrations or doses and androgenic effects at only relatively high concentrations or doses. The degree to which progestational activity is maximized and androgenic activity is minimized is a measure of a progestin's selectivity. The ratio of its affinity for progesterone receptors to its affinity for androgen receptors is the selectivity index. To minimize the androgenic side effects associated with the older progestins, the doses used in OCs have been reduced over the years. These dose reductions have decreased the potential for undesired androgenic effects but also have negatively affected cycle control. Three new progestins, norgestimate, desogestrel, and gestodene, have relatively greater affinity for progesterone receptors than for androgen receptors when compared with the older agents, permitting a reduction in androgenic side effects without the need for further dose reduction. Preclinical receptor-binding studies and animal pharmacologic studies have documented the higher selectivity indexes of these new progestins. Their higher ratios of progestational to androgenic activity provide the basis for the reduction in androgenic adverse effects observed with their clinical use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Methods--administraction and dosage; Desogestrel; Family Planning; Gestodene; Hormone Receptors; Literature Review; Membrane Proteins; Norgestimate; Oral Contraceptives, Combined--administraction and dosage; Oral Contraceptives--administraction and dosage; Physiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8178899     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)05012-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer: a prospective study of young women.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Graham A Colditz; Susan E Hankinson; Susan Malspeis; Donna Spiegelman; Wendy Chen; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Decreased maximal aerobic capacity with use of a triphasic oral contraceptive in highly active women: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  C M Lebrun; M A Petit; D C McKenzie; J E Taunton; J C Prior
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  A new highly specific and robust yeast androgen bioassay for the detection of agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Toine F H Bovee; Richard J R Helsdingen; Astrid R M Hamers; Majorie B M van Duursen; Michel W F Nielen; Ron L A P Hoogenboom
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Ovarian and adrenal androgens and their link to high human chorionic gonadotropin levels: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez; Jesús Zacarías Villarreal-Pérez; Felipe Arturo Morales-Martinez; René Rodríguez-Guajardo; Gloria González-Saldivar; Leonardo G Mancillas-Adame; Neri Alejandro Alvarez-Villalobos; Fernando Javier Lavalle-Gonzalez; José Gerardo González-González
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.257

5.  Migration of a contraceptive subdermal device into the lung.

Authors:  Ji Hui Choi; Ha-Yeon Kim; Sung Soo Lee; SiHyun Cho
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-05-15

6.  Effects of oral contraceptive pills on mood and magnetic resonance imaging measures of prefrontal cortical thickness.

Authors:  Nicole Petersen; Nicholas W Kearley; Dara G Ghahremani; Jean-Baptiste Pochon; Megan E Fry; Andrea J Rapkin; Edythe D London
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 15.992

7.  No Differences in Value-Based Decision-Making Due to Use of Oral Contraceptives.

Authors:  Carolin A Lewis; Ann-Christin S Kimmig; Nils B Kroemer; Shakoor Pooseh; Michael N Smolka; Julia Sacher; Birgit Derntl
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.055

8.  Hormonal content and potency of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk among young women.

Authors:  M D Althuis; D R Brogan; R J Coates; J R Daling; M D Gammon; K E Malone; J B Schoenberg; L A Brinton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.