Literature DB >> 8178556

Safety, immunogenicity and protective effect of the SPf66 malaria synthetic vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum infection in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled field trial in an endemic area of Ecuador.

F Sempértegui1, B Estrella, J Moscoso, L Piedrahita, D Hernández, J Gaybor, P Naranjo, O Mancero, S Arias, R Bernal.   

Abstract

A total of 537 subjects were randomized to receive either SPf66 malaria vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum or placebo in three doses (days 0, 30 and 180). Subjects completing the course of vaccination (230 in the vaccine and 238 in the placebo group) were followed up for a further 12 months. Case detection surveillance was implemented by parasitological cross-sectional surveys every 2 months and by monthly household visits to each participant. Symptomatic subjects were also diagnosed in a local health centre. Minor local side-effects were observed mainly after the second dose in about 19% of the vaccinated subjects and in 3.7% of the placebo group. Thirty days after the third dose the prevalence of anti-SPf66 antibodies was 57% in the vaccine and 8.8% in the placebo groups. The prevaccination prevalence of antibodies measured by indirect immunofluorescence assay increased with age and seemed to be inversely related to anti-SPf66 antibody production. Immune response to SPf66 was independent of age. Vaccine efficacy was calculated based on person-time of exposure. The protective effect considering any malaria episode was 66.8% (95% confidence interval = -2.7-89.3%) and considering only one episode per individual was 60.2% (95% confidence interval = -26-87.5%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8178556     DOI: 10.1016/0264-410x(94)90098-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  9 in total

Review 1.  Vaccine trials.

Authors:  C P Farrington; E Miller
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Vaccines for preventing malaria (SPf66).

Authors:  P Graves; H Gelband
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

3.  Use of reconstituted influenza virus virosomes as an immunopotentiating delivery system for a peptide-based vaccine.

Authors:  F Pöltl-Frank; R Zurbriggen; A Helg; F Stuart; J Robinson; R Glück; G Pluschke
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Malaria vaccines.

Authors:  R Amador; M E Patarroyo
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 5.  WITHDRAWN: Vaccines for preventing malaria.

Authors:  P Graves; H Gelband
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

6.  IMPIPS: the immune protection-inducing protein structure concept in the search for steric-electron and topochemical principles for complete fully-protective chemically synthesised vaccine development.

Authors:  Manuel Elkin Patarroyo; Adriana Bermúdez; Martha Patricia Alba; Magnolia Vanegas; Armando Moreno-Vranich; Luis Antonio Poloche; Manuel Alfonso Patarroyo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Conserved Binding Regions Provide the Clue for Peptide-Based Vaccine Development: A Chemical Perspective.

Authors:  Hernando Curtidor; César Reyes; Adriana Bermúdez; Magnolia Vanegas; Yahson Varela; Manuel E Patarroyo
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Strategies for developing multi-epitope, subunit-based, chemically synthesized anti-malarial vaccines.

Authors:  M E Patarroyo; G Cifuentes; A Bermúdez; M A Patarroyo
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 9.  Diversify and Conquer: The Vaccine Escapism of Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Alena Pance
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-11-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.