Literature DB >> 8177690

Differential sensitivity to static visual cues in the control of postural equilibrium in man.

J Crémieux1, S Mesure.   

Abstract

Decreasing the visual sampling rate by reducing the stroboscopic frequency affected the postural performance of human subjects. At low strobe frequencies of up to 2 flashes/sec., at which only static visual cues were available, no decrease in subjects' mean postural sway was previously observed as compared to their equilibrium behavior without vision. In this experiment, to test the hypothesis that there may be a differential sensitivity to static visual cues in the control of postural equilibrium, we examined the possible effects of subjects' sex and previous sports training on this sensitivity. The static postural equilibrium abilities of 70 subjects of both sexes were tested in a sharpened Romberg position. Performance was measured with accelerometers within a vertical cylinder under normal illumination, 2-Hz stroboscopic light, and darkness. Comparisons between the average postural performances under 2-Hz strobe light and darkness showed no significant differences between conditions. Analysis of subjects' individual scores showed that 27% of the sample performed significantly better under the strobe light than in darkness, 57% produced similar performances under both conditions, and 16% performed better in darkness. Although significant differences existed between the postural performances of men and women and between trained and untrained subjects, no differences were observed in the differential sensitivity to static visual cues depending on subjects' sex or on previous physical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8177690     DOI: 10.2466/pms.1994.78.1.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  9 in total

1.  Differences in preferred reference frames for postural orientation shown by after-effects of stance on an inclined surface.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Fay B Horak; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control.

Authors:  Brice Isableu; Théophile Ohlmann; Jacques Crémieux; Bernard Amblard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Variability in the control of head movements in seated humans: a link with whiplash injuries?

Authors:  N Vibert; H G MacDougall; C de Waele; D P Gilchrist; A M Burgess; A Sidis; A Migliaccio; I S Curthoys; P P Vidal
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Control of bipedal posture following localised muscle fatigue of the plantar-flexors and finger-flexors.

Authors:  Petra Hlavackova; Didier Pradon; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Comparison of static balance and the role of vision in elite athletes.

Authors:  Raouf Hammami; David G Behm; Mokhtar Chtara; Aymen Ben Othman; Anis Chaouachi
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Head Stability and Head-Trunk Coordination in Horseback Riders: The Contribution of Visual Information According to Expertise.

Authors:  Agnès Olivier; Elise Faugloire; Laure Lejeune; Sophie Biau; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Plantar Exteroceptive Inefficiency causes an asynergic use of plantar and visual afferents for postural control: Best means of remediation.

Authors:  Arnaud Foisy; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Postural Changes During Exteroceptive Thin Plantar Stimulation: The Effect of Prolonged Use and Different Plantar Localizations.

Authors:  Marco Tramontano; Jacopo Piermaria; Giovanni Morone; Alice Reali; Martin Vergara; Federica Tamburella
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13

9.  Postural Effects of Vestibular Manipulation Depend on the Physical Activity Status.

Authors:  Julien Maitre; Thierry Paillard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.