Literature DB >> 817662

Comparison and evaluation of ticarcillin and carbenicillin using disk diffusion methods.

M F Parry, H C Neu.   

Abstract

Ticarcillin has proved to be two- to fourfold more active than carbenicillin against most strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although susceptibility of the Enterobacteriaceae to ticarcillin could be predicted from results obtained with carbenicillin disks, neither the 50-mug nor the 100-mug carbenicillin disk proved suitable for testing susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to ticarcillin. Forty-three percent of Pseudomonas strains judged to be resistant to carbenicillin by the 100-mug carbenicillin disk were susceptible to ticarcillin by agar dilution studies. Results obtained with a 75-mug ticarcillin disk showed excellent correlation between zone size and ticarcillin minimal inhibitory concentration values and produced good discrimination between resistant and susceptible strains of Pseudomonas as determined by agar dilution studies. Using a 75-mug ticarcillin disk, a zone size of 12 to 14 mm was appropriate for designating intermediate susceptibility, and a zone greater than or equal to 15 mm was appropriate for designating susceptible strains of both P. aeruginosa and the Enterobacteriaceae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 817662      PMCID: PMC429588          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  8 in total

1.  Carbenicillin: clinical and laboratory experience with a parenterally administered penicillin for treatment of Pseudomonas infections.

Authors:  H C Neu; H Swarz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to carbenicillin.

Authors:  W H Traub; E A Raymond
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-10

4.  In vitro activity of carbenicillin against Pseudomonas using the disc diffusion method.

Authors:  J A Washington; M M Hall; C J Fausch; K L Brackin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Comparison and evaluation of carbenicillin disks in diffusion susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J M Matsen; M E Lund; D C Brooker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparative in vitro activity and clinical pharmacology of ticarcillin and carbenicillin.

Authors:  H C Neu; G J Garvey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro action of carbenicillin against bacteria isolated from clinical material.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; M Siegel
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-09

8.  Interpretation of diffusion susceptibility data obtained with 50-mu g carbenicillin discs against gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  W H Traub; E A Raymond
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-11
  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Agar disk diffusion susceptibility characteristics of azlocillin, carbenicillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin.

Authors:  D Phaneuf; H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Proposed ticarcillin disk control values for Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: multicenter cooperative study.

Authors:  R B Prior; R J Fass
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparison of ticarcillin and carbenicillin activity against random and select populations Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  R B Prior; R J Fass
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antibiotic pharmacokinetics in cystic fibrosis. Differences and clinical significance.

Authors:  R de Groot; A L Smith
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Sensitivity to carbenicillin and ticarcillin, and the beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK in 1978-79.

Authors:  J D King; T Farmer; C Reading; R Sutherland
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Piperacillin susceptibility tests by the single-disk agar diffusion technique.

Authors:  A L Barry; C Thornsberry; R E Badal; C N Baker; R N Jones; E H Gerlach
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Mezlocillin: tentative interpretive standards for disk diffusion susceptibility testing.

Authors:  P C Fuchs; A L Barry; C Thornsberry; R N Jones; E H Gerlack
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.