Literature DB >> 8175022

Carcinoma of the cervix following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

A G Shumsky1, G C Stuart, J Nation.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the reasons for treatment failures in patients managed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who subsequently developed invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Of 672 patients seen with cervical carcinoma from 1980 to 1990 inclusive, at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 24 (3.6%) had previously undergone conservative treatment for CIN and represent the current study population. The initial colposcopic-guided biopsy showed metaplasia (2), CIN 2 (5), and CIN 3 (17). The conservative treatment methods included observation (5), electrocautery (1), laser ablation (3), surgical cone (5), and cryotherapy (10). The mean time interval in months from conservative treatment of CIN to diagnosis of cervical cancer was 21.8 with cryotherapy and 26.7 with laser ablation. The FIGO stage of invasive cervical cancer was Stage 1A (7), Stage 1B (15), Stage 2A (1), and Stage 3 (1). The single death was a patient aged 30 with metastatic small cell cervical carcinoma arising within 4 years of cryotherapy for CIN 3. Of the 24 patients, 13 were managed appropriately yet developed carcinoma, 3 deviated from an accepted standard colposcopy protocol, 5 had inadequate follow-up, 2 refused treatment, and 1 developed de novo disease. The principle reason for treatment failure according to the literature is blatant deviation from protocol. This study, however, suggests that established invasive disease may have gone undetected prior to an ablative therapy. Difficulties related to diagnosis are discussed. The importance of peer reviews becomes evident if practices are to be evaluated and changes to protocols are to be implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8175022     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

1.  Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy.

Authors:  A M Zaitoun; G McKee; M J Coppen; S M Thomas; P O Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of Punch Biopsy and Loop Biopsy for the Management of Severe Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN).

Authors:  Anjula Sahai; Vandana Bansal; Priyanka Singh
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-08-06

3.  Analysis of the agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy in a single tertiary center of Chengdu.

Authors:  Juan Li; Wei Wang; Ping Yang; Jing Chen; Qianling Dai; Ping Hua; Dandan Liu
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040).

Authors:  Yung Taek Ouh; Ji Jeong Park; Minjoo Kang; Miseon Kim; Jae Yun Song; So Jin Shin; Seung Hyuk Shim; Heon Jong Yoo; Maria Lee; Sung Jong Lee; Whan Shin; Gun Oh Chong; Min Chul Choi; Chel Hun Choi; Kyung Jin Min
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Quality of tissue from punch biopsy forceps vs. round loop electrode in colposcopically directed biopsy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thanita Wetcho; Athithan Rattanaburi; Kanet Kanjanapradit
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.401

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.