Literature DB >> 8174728

Epididymal micropuncture with in vitro fertilization and oocyte micromanipulation for the treatment of unreconstructable obstructive azoospermia.

P N Schlegel1, A S Berkeley, M Goldstein, J Cohen, M Alikani, A Adler, B R Gilbert, Z Rosenwaks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide fertility to couples in whom the man has surgically unreconstructable obstructive azoospermia.
DESIGN: Prospective.
SETTING: Hospital-based IVF unit, including associated division of urologic microsurgery. PATIENTS: Couples referred to our fertility unit for treatment of men with surgically unreconstructable reproductive tract obstruction, including congenital absence of the vas deferens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fertilization, pregnancies, and live births.
RESULTS: Of 51 cycles in which sperm and eggs were retrieved, 67% (34/51) resulted in fertilization and 27.5% (14/51) developed clinical pregnancy. Clinical pregnancy rate per couple was 33% (14/43). A total of 15 live births have been obtained in 11 couples with one ongoing pregnancy. Epididymal length was the best predictor of sperm quality and pregnancy results. For couples with at least the corpus epididymis present, 41% (9/22) of cycles resulted in clinical pregnancies.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy rates are optimized using sperm retrieved from the epididymis by micropuncture and when micromanipulation is available for use during IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8174728     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56703-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  The difficult MESA: findings from tubuli recti sperm aspiration.

Authors:  Ulrike Zenke; Liza Jalalian; Shehua Shen; Paul J Turek
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in azoospermic men who underwent testicular sperm extraction vs. microdissection testicular sperm extraction: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Serajoddin Vahidi; Nima Narimani; Saeid Abouei; Ali Sadeghi; Keivan Lorian; Amirhossein Rahavian
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-10-10

Review 3.  Laboratory processing and intracytoplasmic sperm injection using epididymal and testicular spermatozoa: what can be done to improve outcomes?

Authors:  Wana Popal; Zsolt P Nagy
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 4.  Predictive factors for sperm retrieval and sperm injection outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: do etiology, retrieval techniques and gamete source play a role?

Authors:  Ricardo Miyaoka; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Advances in surgical treatment of male infertility.

Authors:  Hyo Serk Lee; Ju Tae Seo
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 6.  A step-by-step guide to office-based sperm retrieval for obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Robert M Coward; Jesse N Mills
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.