Literature DB >> 8174725

Enhancement of ovarian responsiveness with microdoses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist during ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization.

R T Scott1, D Navot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if women who previously had demonstrated poor ovarian responsiveness during ovulation induction for IVF would obtain an improved follicular response by the administration of microdoses of GnRH agonist (GnRH-a).
DESIGN: Prospective evaluation using the same patients' previous assisted reproductive technology cycles as historic controls.
SETTING: Large military tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Thirty four patients who were low responders (peak E2 < 500 pg/mL [conversion factor to SI unit, 3.67]) during ovulation induction with luteal phase GnRH-a suppression followed by exogenous gonadotropins.
INTERVENTIONS: Follicular phase administration of 20 micrograms leuprolide acetate every 12 hours beginning on cycle day 3 and supplemented with exogenous gonadotropins beginning on cycle day 5. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Paired analysis of initial E2 response, peak E2 level attained, number of follicles > or = 16 mm, duration of stimulation, ampules of gonadotropins required, late follicular LH levels, number of mature oocytes retrieved, and fertilization rates.
RESULTS: Ovarian responsiveness was enhanced during the microdose GnRH-a stimulation cycle when compared with the previous stimulation cycle. Specifically, the patients had a more rapid rise in E2 levels, much higher peak E2 levels, the development of more mature follicles, and the recovery of larger numbers of mature oocytes at the time of retrieval. None of the patients had premature LH surges as evidenced by a significant rise in LH levels or a significant decline in E2 levels. There were no differences in the fertilization rates.
CONCLUSION: Microdose GnRH-a administration beginning in the early follicular phase may result in an augmented ovarian response when compared with traditional GnRH-a-exogenous gonadotropin stimulations. Additionally, it may decrease gonadotropin requirements while effectively preventing premature LH surges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8174725     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56700-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  26 in total

1.  Cessation of low-dose gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist therapy followed by high-dose gonadotropin stimulation yields a favorable ovarian response in poor responders.

Authors:  Pu-Tsui Wang; Robert Kuo-kuang Lee; Jin-Tsung Su; Jen-Wan Hou; Ming-Huei Lin; Yu-Ming Hu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  FSH receptor gene polymorphisms have a role for different ovarian response to stimulation in patients entering IVF/ICSI-ET programs.

Authors:  Dimitris Loutradis; Eleni Patsoula; Vassilis Minas; Giorgos A Koussidis; Aristeidis Antsaklis; Stylianos Michalas; Antonis Makrigiannakis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Impact of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcomes.

Authors:  John L Frattarelli; Catherine Lee Kodama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Management of the poor responder: the role of GnRH agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Eric S Surrey
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  "Co-Flare" stimulation in the poor responder patient: predictive value of the flare response.

Authors:  S Spandorfer; J Navarro; L M Kump; H C Liu; O K Davis; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Effectiveness of low dose of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist on hormonal flare-up.

Authors:  B Bständig; I Cédrin-Durnerin; J N Hugues
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The cumulative dose of gonadotropins used for controlled ovarian stimulation does not influence the odds of embryonic aneuploidy in patients with normal ovarian response.

Authors:  Lucky Sekhon; Kathryn Shaia; Anthony Santistevan; Karen Hunter Cohn; Joseph A Lee; Piraye Yurttas Beim; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Different ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  D Loutradis; P Drakakis; E Vomvolaki; A Antsaklis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist versus GnRH-agonist in ovarian stimulation of poor responders undergoing IVF.

Authors:  Sozos J Fasouliotis; Neri Laufer; Shelley Sabbagh-Ehrlich; Aby Lewin; Arye Hurwitz; Alex Simon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Comparison of the ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-antagonist protocol with microdose flare -up protocol in poor responders: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Bülent Berker; Candan İltemir Duvan; Cemil Kaya; Ruşen Aytaç; Hakan Satıroğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.