Literature DB >> 8173718

Quantity of blood inoculated in a needlestick injury from suture needles.

N T Bennett1, R J Howard.   

Abstract

We wanted to quantify the amount of blood inoculum present on several commonly used surgical and phlebotomy needles and to determine the effect of single or double gloving, the depth of needle penetration and needle size on inoculum volume. Nineteen, 22 gauge and 25 gauge phlebotomy needles, as well as the tapered suture needles from zero, 3-0 and 5-0 sutures and a cutting needle from a 4-0 suture were assessed. The needles were dipped into blood labeled with 125I-epidermal growth factor and then embedded 2 or 5 millimeters into an agarose gel. The volume of blood inoculum ranged from 133 to 683 nanoliters for the phlebotomy needles and from 35 to 366 nanoliters for the suture needles. Needles were then passed through none, one or two layers of surgical glove material before embedding the needles 5 millimeters into agarose gel. The use of one layer of surgical glove resulted in a significant (p < 0.001) decrease in inoculum from tapered suture needles, but not from the cutting needles. Two gloves were even more efficient (p < 0.001) than one glove at removing blood from all suture needles, including the cutting needle. However, surgical glove material did not significantly reduce the volume of blood inoculum transferred by the phlebotomy needles. The size of the needle and depth of penetration were found to have a significant influence on inoculum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8173718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  14 in total

1.  Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.

Authors:  S Thomas; M Agarwal; G Mehta
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Incidence and risk factors of occupational blood exposure: a nation-wide survey among Danish doctors.

Authors:  S Nelsing; T L Nielsen; H Brønnum-Hansen; J O Nielsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Disposable needles should be the only instrument used to test sensation in neurologic examinations.

Authors:  B Durham; J Wasserburger
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-03

4.  Protective gloves for use in high-risk patients: how much do they affect the dexterity of the surgeon?

Authors:  A M Phillips; N C Birch; W J Ribbans
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  Personal Protective Equipment in Animal Research.

Authors:  Jason S Villano; Janet M Follo; Mark G Chappell; Morris T Collins
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 0.982

6.  Sharpless surgery: a prospective study of the feasibility of performing operations using non-sharp techniques in an urban, university-based surgical practice.

Authors:  Martin A Makary; Peter J Pronovost; Eric S Weiss; E Anne Millman; David Chang; Susan P Baker; Edward E Cornwell; Dora Syin; Julie A Freischlag
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The Effect of Intraoperative Glove Choice on Carpal Tunnel Pressure.

Authors:  Edward W Jernigan; Brandon S Smetana; Wayne A Rummings; Hannah A Dineen; J Megan M Patterson; Reid W Draeger
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2018-09-28

Review 8.  Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.

Authors:  J Tanner; H Parkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

9.  Risk of hepatitis C virus transmission from patients to surgeons: model based on an unlinked anonymous study of hepatitis C virus prevalence in hospital patients in Glasgow.

Authors:  D Thorburn; K Roy; S O Cameron; J Johnston; S Hutchinson; E A B McCruden; P R Mills; D J Goldberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons.

Authors:  Hui-Ling Kerr; Nicola Stewart; Alistair Pace; Sherief Elsayed
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.