Literature DB >> 8173536

Psychology and screening: narrowing the gap between efficacy and effectiveness.

T M Marteau1.   

Abstract

The success of any health-related screening programme depends primarily upon behavioural factors, namely whether people attend, and for those who do attend, the cognitive, emotional and behavioural consequences of doing so. Some of the problems now evident in screening programmes, such as low attendance or high levels of anxiety following participation are due in part to an under-investigation of the psychological processes and outcomes critical to achieving the goals of screening programmes. These goals include high rates of informed participation and satisfactory psychological outcomes of such participation. The development of psychological models in this area may help in documenting the factors mediating and moderating responses to screening, and may suggest interventions likely to facilitate the achievement of the goals of a screening programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8173536     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1994.tb01089.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6657


  6 in total

1.  Community development in the new NHS.

Authors:  B Fisher; S Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Screening for genital chlamydial infection: the agenda for general practice.

Authors:  T Stokes; M Santer; J Mears
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Screening in primary care: pointers for further research.

Authors:  R Mayou
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

5.  The ethics of type 1 diabetes prediction and prevention research.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Communication of cancer screening results by letter, telephone or in person: A mixed methods systematic review of the effect on attendee anxiety, understanding and preferences.

Authors:  Sian Williamson; Jacoby Patterson; Rebecca Crosby; Rebecca Johnson; Harbinder Sandhu; Samantha Johnson; Jacquie Jenkins; Margaret Casey; Olive Kearins; Sian Taylor-Phillips
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-12-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.