Literature DB >> 8172975

Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques.

F F Yin1, M L Giger, K Doi, C J Vyborny, R A Schmidt.   

Abstract

Mammographic screening of asymptomatic women has shown effectiveness in the reduction of breast cancer mortality. We are developing a computerized scheme for the detection of mammographic masses as an aid to radiologists in mammographic screening programs. Possible masses on digitized screen/film mammograms are initially identified using a nonlinear bilateral-subtraction technique, which is based on asymmetric density patterns occurring in corresponding portions of right and left mammograms. In this study, we analyze the characteristics of actual masses and nonmass detections to develop feature-analysis techniques with which to reduce the number of nonmass (ie, false-positive) detections. These feature-analysis techniques involve (1) the extraction of various features (such as area, contrast, circularity and border-distance based on the density and geometric information of masses in both processed, and original breast images), and (2) tests of the extracted features to reduce nonmass detections. Cumulative histograms of both actual-mass detections and nonmass detections are used to characterize extracted features and to determine the cutoff values used in the feature tests. The effectiveness of the feature-analysis techniques is evaluated in combination with the computerized detection scheme that uses the nonlinear bilateral-subtraction technique using free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis and 77 patient cases (308 mammograms). Results show that the feature-analysis techniques effectively improve the performance of the computerized detection scheme: about 35% false-positive detections were eliminated without loss in sensitivity when the feature-analysis techniques were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8172975     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; L H Winter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images.

Authors:  F F Yin; M L Giger; K Doi; C E Metz; C J Vyborny; R A Schmidt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Breast masses: mammographic evaluation.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Y Wu; M L Giger; K Doi; C J Vyborny; R A Schmidt; C E Metz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses.

Authors:  F F Yin; M L Giger; C J Vyborny; K Doi; R A Schmidt
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Decreased breast cancer mortality through mammographic screening: results of clinical trials.

Authors:  S A Feig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  L Tabàr; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day; A Gad; O Gröntoft
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 9.  Breast masses. Mammographic and sonographic evaluation.

Authors:  S A Feig
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Neighbourhood search feature selection method for content-based mammogram retrieval.

Authors:  D Abraham Chandy; A Hepzibah Christinal; Alwyn John Theodore; S Easter Selvan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.