BACKGROUND: Variability in timing of baseline quality of life (QL) assessments in two ongoing International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) randomized clinical trials occurred as a result of allowing some flexibility in the timing. This retrospective report describes the QL timing in relation to surgery and start of adjuvant therapy and its effect on QL self-estimation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Self-administered measures of baseline QL were obtained on day 1 of adjuvant therapy or as close to that date as possible from 1389 pre- and post-menopausal women with operable breast cancer. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of QL assessments were done on day 1 of adjuvant therapy, 18% before day 1 and 28% after. An ANOVA, controlling for surgery, institution and language, showed that: for patients receiving endocrine therapy alone, QL improved as time from surgery increased, but start of adjuvant treatment had no effect, while for chemotherapy patients, appetite, physical well-being and, in pre-menopausal patients, coping were worse 1 to 5 days after the start of treatment. Chemotherapy had little effect on mood and emotional well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of QL assessment in relation to diagnosis affects global adjustment measures; timing in relation to chemotherapy affects measures sensitive to toxicity. Timing is an important consideration in study conduct and data analysis.
BACKGROUND: Variability in timing of baseline quality of life (QL) assessments in two ongoing International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) randomized clinical trials occurred as a result of allowing some flexibility in the timing. This retrospective report describes the QL timing in relation to surgery and start of adjuvant therapy and its effect on QL self-estimation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Self-administered measures of baseline QL were obtained on day 1 of adjuvant therapy or as close to that date as possible from 1389 pre- and post-menopausal women with operable breast cancer. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of QL assessments were done on day 1 of adjuvant therapy, 18% before day 1 and 28% after. An ANOVA, controlling for surgery, institution and language, showed that: for patients receiving endocrine therapy alone, QL improved as time from surgery increased, but start of adjuvant treatment had no effect, while for chemotherapy patients, appetite, physical well-being and, in pre-menopausal patients, coping were worse 1 to 5 days after the start of treatment. Chemotherapy had little effect on mood and emotional well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of QL assessment in relation to diagnosis affects global adjustment measures; timing in relation to chemotherapy affects measures sensitive to toxicity. Timing is an important consideration in study conduct and data analysis.
Authors: D E Ediebah; C Coens; J T Maringwa; C Quinten; E Zikos; J Ringash; M King; C Gotay; H-H Flechtner; J Schmucker von Koch; J Weis; E F Smit; C-H Köhne; A Bottomley Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: J Bernhard; C Hürny; A S Coates; H F Peterson; M Castiglione-Gertsch; R D Gelber; E Galligioni; G Marini; B Thürlimann; J F Forbes; A Goldhirsch; H J Senn; C M Rudenstam Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: J Bernhard; D Zahrieh; A S Coates; R D Gelber; M Castiglione-Gertsch; E Murray; J F Forbes; L Perey; J Collins; R Snyder; C-M Rudenstam; D Crivellari; A Veronesi; B Thürlimann; M F Fey; K N Price; A Goldhirsch; C Hürny Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-11-29 Impact factor: 7.640