Literature DB >> 8172509

Clinical use of neck isometric strength measurement in rehabilitation.

J Ylinen1, J Ruuska.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate for diagnostic purposes the isometric strength of the neck flexor and extensor muscles in 56 patients with neck and shoulder pain and to quantify the effect of a specific rehabilitation program. An isometric measurement protocol was performed at the beginning and at the end of a 3-week rehabilitation program that included physiotherapy, stretching, aerobic exercises, and circuit training to improve arm, shoulder, and neck muscle strength. In the beginning, mean neck flexor muscle isometric strength was 83N (+/- 48 SD) and extensor muscle strength 158N (+/- 76 SD), whereas after rehabilitation the strength measurements were 117N (+/- 43 SD) and 207N (+/- 84 SD) respectively. There was a significant increase in the ability to push forward and backward, which correlated with the lessening of neck pain and disability found at the end of the program (p < .05). Isometric strength measurement is a useful and practical method of objectively showing a functional improvement in response to rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8172509     DOI: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90173-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  9 in total

1.  Cervical muscle strength measurement in two groups of elite Greco-Roman and free style wrestlers and a group of non-athletic subjects.

Authors:  A Rezasoltani; A Ahmadi; M Nehzate-Khoshroh; F Forohideh; J Ylinen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Can a Specific Neck Strengthening Program Decrease Cervical Spine Injuries in a Men's Professional Rugby Union Team? A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Robert Naish; Angus Burnett; Sally Burrows; Warren Andrews; Brendyn Appleby
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Chiropractic clinical practice guideline: evidence-based treatment of adult neck pain not due to whiplash.

Authors:  Elizabeth Anderson-Peacock; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Roland Bryans; Normand Danis; Andrea Furlan; Henri Marcoux; Brock Potter; Rick Ruegg; Janice Gross Stein; Eleanor White
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-09

4.  The Effect of Physical Exercise Training on Neck and Shoulder Muscle Function Among Military Helicopter Pilots and Crew: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mike Murray; Britt Lange; Karen Søgaard; Gisela Sjøgaard
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23

5.  Assessment of Neuromuscular and Psychological Function in People with Recurrent Neck Pain during a Period of Remission: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses.

Authors:  Ahmed Alalawi; Valter Devecchi; Alessio Gallina; Alejandro Luque-Suarez; Deborah Falla
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study.

Authors:  Jeff Habberfield; Geoff Schneider; Kathryn Schneider; Sozina Katuli; Lee Olson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Effects of Cervical Spine Exercise Protocol on Neck Pain, Pericervical Muscle Endurance, and Range of Motion in Medical Students: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Bryan G Anderson; Brett Benzinger; Jason Chickness; Chris Hietanen; Kylan Hill; Jean-Marc P Lucas; Joshua Tuck; Michael Ghassibi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-22

8.  Effect of Deep Cervical Flexor Muscle Training Using Pressure Biofeedback on Pain and Forward Head Posture in School Teachers with Neck Pain: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Ahmad H Alghadir; Zaheen A Iqbal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Effect of brief daily resistance training on rapid force development in painful neck and shoulder muscles: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kenneth Jay; Mc Schraefel; Christoffer H Andersen; Frederik S Ebbesen; David H Christiansen; Jørgen Skotte; Mette K Zebis; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.273

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.