Literature DB >> 8172370

Barrier protection with examination gloves: double versus single.

D M Korniewicz1, M Kirwin, K Cresci, T Sing, T E Choo, M Wool, E Larson.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments, the barrier integrity of single and double vinyl and latex examination gloves were tested for dye and water leaks after being placed under stress. A total of 886 examination gloves (385 vinyl: single, 199; double, 186; and 501 latex: single, 290; double, 211) were tested with a standardized clinical protocol designed to mimic patient care activities. Leakage rates for single or double gloving were significantly higher for vinyl than for latex gloves. Single vinyl gloves were significantly more likely to leak than were double vinyl gloves (51.3% and 19.7%, p < 0.0001). However, there were essentially no differences in leakage rates for single or double latex gloves (4.1% and 3.8%, p = 1). Significantly higher rates of leakage were identified with the water leak test than with the dye test for vinyl (p < 0.001) but not for latex (p = 0.22) gloves. For vinyl but not latex gloves, there were significant differences in leakage rates by brand. We conclude that double gloving offers little advantage during routine procedures associated with minimal stress to the gloves or when latex gloves are worn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8172370     DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)90085-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  6 in total

1.  2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 2.  Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.

Authors:  J Tanner; H Parkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

3.  Engineered nanomaterials: exposures, hazards, and risk prevention.

Authors:  Robert A Yokel; Robert C Macphail
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  Chitosan and Natural Rubber Latex Biocomposite Prepared by Incorporating Negatively Charged Chitosan Dispersion.

Authors:  Siwarote Boonrasri; Pongdhorn Sae-Oui; Pornchai Rachtanapun
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances.

Authors:  Joanna Y F Lai; Y P Guo; Peggy P L Or; Yi Li
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Recommended practices for prevention of transmissible infections in the perioperative practice setting.

Authors: 
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 0.676

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.