Literature DB >> 8172212

Analysis of the association of dialyzer reuse practices and patient outcomes.

P J Held1, R A Wolfe, D S Gaylin, F K Port, N W Levin, M N Turenne.   

Abstract

This historic prospective study assessed the relationship between dialyzer reuse practices and hemodialysis patient mortality through 1 year of follow-up. Medicare patient demographic and survival data were combined with dialyzer reuse data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's annual survey of dialysis-related diseases. Data were analyzed for the US Medicare hemodialysis population of never transplanted patients prevalent on January 1, 1989, and January 1, 1990, who were treated in freestanding dialysis units that used primarily conventional (not high-flux) dialyzers. Time to mortality, or transplant, and other censoring on December 31st of each year was regressed with proportional hazards models on patient, dialysis unit, and reuse measures. Age-, race-, and diagnosis-standardized mortality ratios for dialysis units were also regressed with weighted least squares techniques against dialysis unit and reuse measures. The results showed that patients treated in dialysis units that disinfected dialyzers with a peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid mixture, or glutaraldehyde experienced higher mortality than patients treated in units that used formalin or in units that did not reuse dialyzers. The relative risk of mortality, compared with patients treated in nonreuse dialysis units, was 1.17 (P = 0.010) for glutaraldehyde and 1.13 (P < 0.001) for the peracetic acid mixture. The relative risk for formalin compared with the reference group of nonreuse was 1.06 (P = 0.088). With adjustment for several patient and dialysis unit characteristics, dialyzer reuse with certain germicides was associated with a significantly elevated mortality risk. This elevated risk, the etiology of which is currently not known, may represent a large number of potentially avoidable deaths per year. Only a large, nationally based analysis of this type has sufficient sample size to detect mortality risks such as these.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8172212     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)70280-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  6 in total

1.  A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: an examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs.

Authors:  Hacer Ozgen; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Dialyzer reuse with peracetic acid does not impact patient mortality.

Authors:  T Christopher Bond; Allen R Nissenson; Mahesh Krishnan; Steven M Wilson; Tracy Mayne
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Abandoning peracetic acid-based dialyzer reuse is associated with improved survival.

Authors:  Eduardo Lacson; Weiling Wang; Ann Mooney; Norma Ofsthun; J Michael Lazarus; Raymond M Hakim
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Practice patterns, case mix, Medicare payment policy, and dialysis facility costs.

Authors:  R A Hirth; P J Held; S M Orzol; A Dor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Does hemodialyzer reuse have a place in current ESRD care: "to be or not to be?".

Authors:  Gerald B Denny; Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Clinical and microbiological effects of dialyzers reuse in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Isabella Carvalho Ribeiro; Noemí Angelica Vieira Roza; Diego Andreazzi Duarte; Dioze Guadagnini; Rosilene Motta Elias; Rodrigo Bueno de Oliveira
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2019-01-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.