Literature DB >> 8172149

The course of biliary and gastrointestinal symptoms after treatment of uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: results of a randomized study comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with conventional cholecystectomy.

P W Plaisier1, R L van der Hul, H G Nijs, R den Toom, O T Terpstra, H A Bruining.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We performed a randomized study that compared extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with conventional cholecystectomy for uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones. The primary outcome of the study was the influence of therapy on biliary colic and gastrointestinal symptoms.
METHODS: In the period October 1989-March 1992, 26 patients were randomized for cholecystectomy and 23 for ESWL. Pain diaries and symptom questionnaires were taken before, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after therapy. ESWL patients regularly underwent ultrasound examination for determining stone clearance. Median follow-up was 18 months (12-24).
RESULTS: Biliary colic was cured in 90.9% and 45.4% of the patients within 3 months after cholecystectomy or ESWL, respectively (p < 0.01). Stomach swelling, fatty food upset, and nausea responded to cholecystectomy after 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Nausea responded to ESWL after 6 months. Vomiting, pyrosis, ructus, diarrhea and constipation did not respond to gallstone therapy. When the two treatment arms were compared, only fatty food upset responded significantly better to cholecystectomy than to ESWL at 18 months (p < 0.05). With regard to the other gastrointestinal symptoms, no significant differences could be detected.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that cholecystectomy is superior to ESWL in improving biliary colic and fatty food upset. Furthermore, because ESWL is not able to clear all stones and harbors the possibility of stone recurrence, cholecystectomy remains the preferred treatment modality in healthy patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8172149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  6 in total

Review 1.  Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness.

Authors:  Mark P Lamberts; Marjolein Lugtenberg; Maroeska M Rovers; Anne J Roukema; Joost P H Drenth; Gert P Westert; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evidence-based surgery: interventions in a regional paediatric surgical unit.

Authors:  S E Kenny; K R Shankar; R Rintala; G L Lamont; D A Lloyd
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Predictions and associations of cholecystectomy in patients with cholecystolithiasis treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  H E Adamek; C Rochlitz; A C Von Bubnoff; D Schilling; J F Riemann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Abdominal symptoms: do they disappear after cholecystectomy?

Authors:  M Y Berger; T C Olde Hartman; A M Bohnen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Is biliary pain exclusively related to gallbladder stones? A controlled prospective study.

Authors:  Marjolein Y Berger; Tim C Olde Hartman; Jurgen J I M van der Velden; Arthur M Bohnen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set.

Authors:  Moira Cruickshank; Rumana Newlands; Jane Blazeby; Irfan Ahmed; Mohamed Bekheit; Miriam Brazzelli; Bernard Croal; Karen Innes; Craig Ramsay; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.