Literature DB >> 8170485

Outliers, a way to detect abnormality in quantitative EMG.

E Stålberg1, C Bischoff, B Falck.   

Abstract

In visual analysis of motor unit potentials it is common to decide abnormality by a few motor unit potentials with definitely abnormal amplitude, duration, and shape. The aim of the present investigation was to define limits of normal values and to compare the diagnostic yield of assessing definitely abnormal values outliers, with conventional mean values of MUP parameters. MUPs were extracted and measured with a new decomposition method. Reference values were obtained for three commonly studied muscles. Patients with various types of neuropathies and myopathies were studied in the same way with measurement of outliers and mean values. It was found that outliers were as sensitive as mean values in neuropathies and better in myopathies. Often an increased number of outliers could already be detected after only a few MUPs had been obtained. It would not have been necessary to obtain all 20 MUPs in these patients. The conclusion is that the outlier method is as sensitive as mean values. Because the number of MUPs required may be reduced, the investigation takes a shorter time and is less painful for the patient. If the degree of abnormality is to be quantified, calculation of mean values is still necessary. The combination of outliers and mean values may be the optimal way to detect and express abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8170485     DOI: 10.1002/mus.880170406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  12 in total

1.  Can be sphincter electromyography reference values shared between laboratories?

Authors:  Simon Podnar; W Thomas Gregory
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Resolving superimposed motor unit action potentials.

Authors:  H Etawil; D Stashuk
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Robust supervised classification of motor unit action potentials.

Authors:  D Stashuk; G M Paoli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  New approaches to motor unit potential analysis.

Authors:  C Iani; E Stålberg; B Falck; C Bishoff
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1994-12

5.  Application of the F-Response for Estimating Motor Unit Number and Amplitude Distribution in Hand Muscles of Stroke Survivors.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Li; Morris Fisher; William Zev Rymer; Ping Zhou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Neuromuscular and sensory disturbances in patients with well treated coeliac disease.

Authors:  L Luostarinen; S-L Himanen; M Luostarinen; P Collin; T Pirttilä
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Bayesian aggregation versus majority vote in the characterization of non-specific arm pain based on quantitative needle electromyography.

Authors:  Andrew Hamilton-Wright; Linda McLean; Daniel W Stashuk; Kristina M Calder
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Inhomogeneous neuromuscular injury of the genioglossus muscle in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Jing-Ying Ye; Lin Hua; Zhao-Hui Chen; Li Ling; Qiang Zhu; Li-Mei Wang; Li Zheng; Yu-Huan Zhang
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  A correlative study of quantitative EMG and biopsy findings in 31 patients with myopathies.

Authors:  E Dardiotis; E Papathanasiou; I Vonta; G Hadjigeorgiou; E Zamba-Papanicolaou; T Kyriakides
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2011-06

10.  Axon count and sympathetic skin responses in lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Authors:  Hacer Erdem Tilki; Melek Coşkun; Neslihan Unal Akdemir; Lütfi Incesu
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.