Literature DB >> 8170368

Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees.

F Tajima1, N Takezaki.   

Abstract

The most commonly used measure of evolutionary distance in molecular phylogenetics is the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. However, this number is not necessarily most efficient for reconstructing a phylogenetic tree. In order to evaluate the accuracy of evolutionary distance, D(t), for obtaining the correct tree topology, an accuracy index, A(t), was proposed. This index is defined as D'(t)/square root of[D(t)], where D'(t) is the first derivative of D(t) with respect to evolutionary time and V[D(t)] is the sampling variance of evolutionary distance. Using A(t), namely, finding the condition under which A(t) gives the maximum value, we can obtain an evolutionary distance which is efficient for obtaining the correct topology. Under the assumption that the transversional changes do not occur as frequently as the transitional changes, we obtained the evolutionary distances which are expected to give the correct topology more often than are the other distances.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8170368     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  11 in total

1.  Peopling of Sahul: mtDNA variation in aboriginal Australian and Papua New Guinean populations.

Authors:  A J Redd; M Stoneking
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  From complete genomes to measures of substitution rate variability within and between proteins.

Authors:  N V Grishin; Y I Wolf; E V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Empirical tests of the reliability of phylogenetic trees constructed with microsatellite DNA.

Authors:  Naoko Takezaki; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  New methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions.

Authors:  Y Ina
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Estimation of evolutionary distances from protein spatial structures.

Authors:  N V Grishin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.

Authors:  Z Yang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA.

Authors:  N Takezaki; M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Inconsistency of the maximum parsimony method when the rate of nucleotide substitution is constant.

Authors:  N Takezaki; M Nei
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  New weighting methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction using multiple loci.

Authors:  Kazuharu Misawa; Fumio Tajima
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans.

Authors:  D B Goldstein; A Ruiz Linares; L L Cavalli-Sforza; M W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.