Literature DB >> 8169480

Endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression.

M W Erdmann1.   

Abstract

A study of endoscopic carpal tunnel release was carried out in three parts, consisting of initial cadaveric dissections, a prospective pilot study of 20 patients and a prospective, randomized trial of 71 patients comparing endoscopic with open decompression. In the main trial, 25 patients with bilateral symptoms underwent simultaneous endoscopic and open release, with the remainder randomized to one or other technique. Both techniques effectively decompressed the median nerve. A significant improvement in group and pinch strength over 3 months was achieved in those undergoing endoscopic surgery. Average return to work was 14 days in the endoscopic series and 39 days in the open series. A complication rate of 35% was achieved with the transbursal endoscopic technique, 3.7% with the extrabursal endoscopic technique and 13.5% in the open series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8169480     DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90038-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Br        ISSN: 0266-7681


  21 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of reporting return to work in studies comparing open with endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Olubimpe Ayeni; Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2005

2.  Application of the CONSORT statement to randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Roderick T Chew; Sheila Sprague; Karen Veltri
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

3.  A cost-utility analysis of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Vanessa H Wong; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

4.  [Morphology of the carpal tunnel. Movement studies in patients with constriction symptoms and healthy probands using MR tomography].

Authors:  K H Allmann; R Horch; A Gabelmann; J Laubenberger; G B Stark; M Langer
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1996-02

Review 5.  Surgical techniques and return to work following carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kaveh A Sanati; Massoud Mansouri; Duncan Macdonald; Shahab Ghafghazi; Ewan Macdonald; Ghasem Yadegarfar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-12

6.  Is main operating room sterility really necessary in carpal tunnel surgery? A multicenter prospective study of minor procedure room field sterility surgery.

Authors:  Martin R Leblanc; Donald H Lalonde; Achilleas Thoma; Mike Bell; Neil Wells; Murray Allen; Peter Chang; Daniel McKee; Jan Lalonde
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2010-11-18

Review 7.  Early major complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of 1200 cases.

Authors:  Raymond W Tse; Lawrence N Hurst; Tawfeik A Al-Yafi
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2003

8.  Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Eli T Sayegh; Robert J Strauch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Nigel L Ashworth
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-03-23

10.  The value of one-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G R Sennwald; R Benedetti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.